The Interest-Free Instruments Used for Public Borrowing in the Ottoman Empire and Medieval Europe: A Comparative Perspective

cem eyerci
{"title":"The Interest-Free Instruments Used for Public Borrowing in the Ottoman Empire and Medieval Europe: A Comparative Perspective","authors":"cem eyerci","doi":"10.30927/ijpf.1196908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Borrowing is not only a practice of individuals and corporations, but the states also borrow to afford their expenditures. Similar to individuals, the states have borrowed since ancient times. Most of such loans have been at interest. However, the authorities have restricted or prohibited interest-based lending in various societies. Thus, the city-states of Medieval Europe and the Ottoman Empire could not always use ordinary borrowing instruments due to the prohibition of interest. Since, in recent years, the modernized forms of the early interest-free public borrowing methods are being asserted to be used by modern economies as well, the paper evaluates the methods used by the European city-states and the Ottoman Empire. At first, rentes and compera, the public borrowing methods used by city-states in Medieval Europe, are presented. Then, iltizam, malikane, and esham, the instruments used by the Ottoman Empire, are introduced. Lastly, the similarities and discrepancies among these interest-free methods utilized by the city-states and the Ottoman Empire are scrutinized.","PeriodicalId":159468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Finance","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1196908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borrowing is not only a practice of individuals and corporations, but the states also borrow to afford their expenditures. Similar to individuals, the states have borrowed since ancient times. Most of such loans have been at interest. However, the authorities have restricted or prohibited interest-based lending in various societies. Thus, the city-states of Medieval Europe and the Ottoman Empire could not always use ordinary borrowing instruments due to the prohibition of interest. Since, in recent years, the modernized forms of the early interest-free public borrowing methods are being asserted to be used by modern economies as well, the paper evaluates the methods used by the European city-states and the Ottoman Empire. At first, rentes and compera, the public borrowing methods used by city-states in Medieval Europe, are presented. Then, iltizam, malikane, and esham, the instruments used by the Ottoman Empire, are introduced. Lastly, the similarities and discrepancies among these interest-free methods utilized by the city-states and the Ottoman Empire are scrutinized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥斯曼帝国和中世纪欧洲用于公共借贷的无息工具:比较视角
借贷不仅是个人和公司的行为,各州也通过借贷来支付其开支。与个人类似,国家自古以来就有借贷行为。大多数此类贷款都是有利息的。然而,当局限制或禁止各种社会的利息贷款。因此,中世纪欧洲的城邦和奥斯曼帝国由于禁止利息,不能总是使用普通的借贷工具。由于近年来,早期无息公共借贷方式的现代化形式也被断言为现代经济体所使用,因此本文对欧洲城邦和奥斯曼帝国所使用的方法进行了评估。首先,介绍了中世纪欧洲城邦使用的公共借贷方式“租金”和“比较”。然后介绍了奥斯曼帝国使用的乐器iltizam、malikane和esham。最后,分析了城邦和奥斯曼帝国使用的这些免息方法的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pandemi Krizi Sürecinde Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Cumhuriyet’in 2. Yüzyılında Değişmesi Gereken Gerçek-Gerçek Olmayan Geriye Yürüme İçtihadı Environmental Tax Reform and the European Green Deal: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data Analysis An Evaluation on the Tax Policy Preferences of Selected European Countries Towards Brain Drain Evaluation of the Action of Rescission in Tax Execution Law in Terms of the Taxpayer's Right of Defense in the Light of the Constitutional Court Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1