Who Is an Efficient and Effective Physician? Evidence From Emergence Medicine

S. Saghafian, Raha Imanirad, S. Traub
{"title":"Who Is an Efficient and Effective Physician? Evidence From Emergence Medicine","authors":"S. Saghafian, Raha Imanirad, S. Traub","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3227873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving the performance of the healthcare sector requires an understanding of the effectiveness and efficiency of care delivered by providers. Although this topic is of great interest to policymakers, researchers, and hospital managers, rigorous methods of measuring effectiveness and efficiency of care delivery have proven elusive. Through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), we make use of evidence from care delivered by emergency physicians, and develop scores that gauge physicians' performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. In order to validate our DEA scores, we independently use various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Random Forest (RF), a Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). After validating our DEA scores via comparison with predictions made by these algorithms, we make use of them to identify the distinguishing behaviors of highly effective and efficient physicians. We find that highly effective physicians order less tests compared to their peers and maintain their effectiveness when working under high workloads. We also observe that highly efficient physicians order less tests on average and become even more efficient during high-volume shifts. Importantly, our results indicate a statistically significant positive relationship between a physician's effectiveness and efficiency scores suggesting that, contrary to conventional wisdom, effectiveness and efficiency in care delivery should be viewed as compliments not substitutes. In addition, we find that effectiveness is lower among physicians who have higher job tenure or average test order count. Efficiency, however, is lower among physicians with less experience (measured in number of years after graduation from medical school) or high average test order count. Furthermore, our results indicate an increase in a physician's average efficiency and a decrease in his/her average effectiveness when faced with high workloads. Finally, we find evidence of peer influence on a focal physician's effectiveness and efficiency, which suggests an opportunity to improve system performance by taking physician characteristics into account when determining the set of physicians that should be scheduled during the same shifts.","PeriodicalId":137980,"journal":{"name":"Public Health eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3227873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Improving the performance of the healthcare sector requires an understanding of the effectiveness and efficiency of care delivered by providers. Although this topic is of great interest to policymakers, researchers, and hospital managers, rigorous methods of measuring effectiveness and efficiency of care delivery have proven elusive. Through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), we make use of evidence from care delivered by emergency physicians, and develop scores that gauge physicians' performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. In order to validate our DEA scores, we independently use various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Random Forest (RF), a Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). After validating our DEA scores via comparison with predictions made by these algorithms, we make use of them to identify the distinguishing behaviors of highly effective and efficient physicians. We find that highly effective physicians order less tests compared to their peers and maintain their effectiveness when working under high workloads. We also observe that highly efficient physicians order less tests on average and become even more efficient during high-volume shifts. Importantly, our results indicate a statistically significant positive relationship between a physician's effectiveness and efficiency scores suggesting that, contrary to conventional wisdom, effectiveness and efficiency in care delivery should be viewed as compliments not substitutes. In addition, we find that effectiveness is lower among physicians who have higher job tenure or average test order count. Efficiency, however, is lower among physicians with less experience (measured in number of years after graduation from medical school) or high average test order count. Furthermore, our results indicate an increase in a physician's average efficiency and a decrease in his/her average effectiveness when faced with high workloads. Finally, we find evidence of peer influence on a focal physician's effectiveness and efficiency, which suggests an opportunity to improve system performance by taking physician characteristics into account when determining the set of physicians that should be scheduled during the same shifts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁是高效的医生?来自急救医学的证据
改善医疗保健部门的绩效需要了解提供者提供的护理的有效性和效率。尽管政策制定者、研究人员和医院管理者对这个话题非常感兴趣,但事实证明,衡量医疗服务有效性和效率的严格方法是难以捉摸的。通过数据包络分析(DEA),我们利用急诊医生提供的护理证据,并制定分数来衡量医生在有效性和效率方面的表现。为了验证我们的DEA分数,我们独立使用各种机器学习(ML)算法,包括支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)、分类和回归树(CART)、随机森林(RF)、广义线性模型(GLM)和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)。通过与这些算法的预测相比较,验证了我们的DEA评分后,我们利用它们来识别高效和高效医生的区别行为。我们发现,与同行相比,高效的医生要求更少的检查,并且在高工作量下工作时保持效率。我们还观察到,效率高的医生的平均检查次数更少,而且在高工作量轮班时效率更高。重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,医生的有效性和效率得分之间存在统计学上显著的正相关关系,这表明,与传统观念相反,医疗服务的有效性和效率应被视为赞美而不是替代。此外,我们发现,效能较低的医生谁拥有较高的任期或平均测试订单数。然而,在经验较少(以从医学院毕业后的年数衡量)或平均测试订单数较高的医生中,效率较低。此外,我们的研究结果表明,当面对高工作量时,医生的平均效率会提高,而他/她的平均效率会降低。最后,我们发现了同行影响焦点医生的有效性和效率的证据,这表明在确定应在同一班次安排的医生集时,考虑到医生的特征,有机会提高系统性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current trends in the visual transformation of periodic publications in the field of medicine and social care The Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Bodyweight Status and Lifestyle Behaviors Among US Adults: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2018-2020 An Analysis of Nepal’s Clinical Pediatric Services and Policies to Address Child Mortality The Effect of 'Failed' Community Mental Health Centers on Non-White Mortality This Great Catastrophe: Bungling Pandemics from 1918 to Today
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1