Using Grid as Teaching Strategy in Teaching Mathematics

Rosemarie Magnaye, Aries Magnaye
{"title":"Using Grid as Teaching Strategy in Teaching Mathematics","authors":"Rosemarie Magnaye, Aries Magnaye","doi":"10.7719/irj.v13i1.785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes how Grid as a graphic organizer can significantly improve the numeracy level in Mathematics of the Grade 3 pupils in addition and subtraction and identify common errors and misconceptions in adding and subtracting whole numbers. To answer this question, we compared the performance of Grade 3 pupil participants. Fifty-six percent (n= 39) from Jose Rizal Memorial School and forty-four percent (n=31) from San Juan Elementary School. Out of 70 pupils, 57 or 81.43% belonged to the non-numerate level, 13 or 18.57% were classified as instructional and non-numerate. The descriptive design was utilized. The data were analyzed using mean, frequency count, percentage, and z-test in determining the effect of the grid as a graphic organizer on the numeracy level of Grade 3 Pupils. The results of the study indicate that the numeracy level of Grade 3 pupils after using the grid as a graphic organizer revealed that the non-numerate pupils were lessened to 23 out of 70 or 32.86%, instructional pupils increased to 27 or 38.57% and numerates became 20 or 28.57%. The computed mean was increased to 5.87, having a scale description of the instructional level. The findings suggest that Grid as a graphic organizer helped a lot in proper alignment of numbers to avoid common errors and misconceptions and was found to be an effective teaching strategy in teaching Mathematics.","PeriodicalId":148730,"journal":{"name":"JPAIR Institutional Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPAIR Institutional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7719/irj.v13i1.785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes how Grid as a graphic organizer can significantly improve the numeracy level in Mathematics of the Grade 3 pupils in addition and subtraction and identify common errors and misconceptions in adding and subtracting whole numbers. To answer this question, we compared the performance of Grade 3 pupil participants. Fifty-six percent (n= 39) from Jose Rizal Memorial School and forty-four percent (n=31) from San Juan Elementary School. Out of 70 pupils, 57 or 81.43% belonged to the non-numerate level, 13 or 18.57% were classified as instructional and non-numerate. The descriptive design was utilized. The data were analyzed using mean, frequency count, percentage, and z-test in determining the effect of the grid as a graphic organizer on the numeracy level of Grade 3 Pupils. The results of the study indicate that the numeracy level of Grade 3 pupils after using the grid as a graphic organizer revealed that the non-numerate pupils were lessened to 23 out of 70 or 32.86%, instructional pupils increased to 27 or 38.57% and numerates became 20 or 28.57%. The computed mean was increased to 5.87, having a scale description of the instructional level. The findings suggest that Grid as a graphic organizer helped a lot in proper alignment of numbers to avoid common errors and misconceptions and was found to be an effective teaching strategy in teaching Mathematics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网格教学策略在数学教学中的应用
本文分析了网格作为图形组织者如何显著提高三年级学生的数学加减法水平,识别整数加减法中的常见错误和误解。为了回答这个问题,我们比较了三年级小学生的表现。56% (n= 39)来自Jose Rizal纪念学校,44% (n=31)来自圣胡安小学。70名学生中,57名(81.43%)属于非计算水平,13名(18.57%)属于教学和非计算水平。采用描述性设计。采用平均数、频率计数、百分比和z检验对数据进行分析,以确定网格作为图形组织者对三年级小学生算术水平的影响。研究结果表明,使用网格作为图形组织者后,三年级学生的计算水平显示,70名学生中,不会计算的学生减少到23名(32.86%),有教学能力的学生增加到27名(38.57%),有计算能力的学生增加到20名(28.57%)。计算平均值增加到5.87,对教学水平进行了量表描述。研究结果表明,网格作为一种图形组织者,对数字的正确排列有很大的帮助,可以避免常见的错误和误解,是一种有效的数学教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lived Experiences of Technology and Livelihood Education Teachers on the Challenges and Benefits of Facilitating Online Learning Academic and Non-Academic Profile Affecting the Nurse Licensure Examination Performance of the Nursing Graduates of a Higher Education Institution in Davao City Bicol College Ed. D. and Ph. D. Graduates from 2012-2021: A Tracer Study Evaluation of Arts-Based Performance Tasks in Hybrid Classes Implications of Flexible Learning to Politics and Economics of Educational Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1