Nurses Perceptions of the Utilization of the Violence Assessment Tool (VAT) in Northeastern Ontario

Oghenefego (Fego) Akpomi-Eferakeya, J. Horrigan, R. Heale, E. Donato
{"title":"Nurses Perceptions of the Utilization of the Violence Assessment Tool (VAT) in Northeastern Ontario","authors":"Oghenefego (Fego) Akpomi-Eferakeya, J. Horrigan, R. Heale, E. Donato","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace violence (WPV) is an ongoing problem in health care. Most of the cases of WPV are caused by the patients, patients’ families, and friends. Violence in hospitals among registered nurses has led to 56% of lost time injuries, and in 2018, Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) reported 13% of lost time injuries due to WPV. The Public Services Health and Safety Association (PSHSA) created the Violence Assessment Tool [VAT] to predict the possible risk of violence from patients in acute care settings. Health care workers can use the VAT to assess risk, apply possible control measures and improve their safety. As part of a larger study, the aim of this research is to explore nurses’ perceptions of the utilization of the VAT in assessing the potential risk of violence, and to identify any gaps, challenges, or improvements needed in the VAT. An Interpretive Description research design by Sally Thorne in (2016) will be used. The model that will guide this study is the Haddon Matrix framework of workplace violence prevention. The study will involve three focus groups via zoom virtual meetings with 6 to 8 participants per session, and an expected total of 18-24 participants. Focus group interviews will use semi-structured questions to guide the discussion among nurses working in a Northeastern Ontario hospital. Interpretive description data analysis will be guided by Thorne’s processes of data analysis. This will be the first study to examine nurses’ perceptions of the VAT in Ontario. The findings of this study will help to determine the predictive validity of the VAT and any potential changes that may be needed. The findings of this study could lead to reduced violence and associated costs within the healthcare sector.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace violence (WPV) is an ongoing problem in health care. Most of the cases of WPV are caused by the patients, patients’ families, and friends. Violence in hospitals among registered nurses has led to 56% of lost time injuries, and in 2018, Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) reported 13% of lost time injuries due to WPV. The Public Services Health and Safety Association (PSHSA) created the Violence Assessment Tool [VAT] to predict the possible risk of violence from patients in acute care settings. Health care workers can use the VAT to assess risk, apply possible control measures and improve their safety. As part of a larger study, the aim of this research is to explore nurses’ perceptions of the utilization of the VAT in assessing the potential risk of violence, and to identify any gaps, challenges, or improvements needed in the VAT. An Interpretive Description research design by Sally Thorne in (2016) will be used. The model that will guide this study is the Haddon Matrix framework of workplace violence prevention. The study will involve three focus groups via zoom virtual meetings with 6 to 8 participants per session, and an expected total of 18-24 participants. Focus group interviews will use semi-structured questions to guide the discussion among nurses working in a Northeastern Ontario hospital. Interpretive description data analysis will be guided by Thorne’s processes of data analysis. This will be the first study to examine nurses’ perceptions of the VAT in Ontario. The findings of this study will help to determine the predictive validity of the VAT and any potential changes that may be needed. The findings of this study could lead to reduced violence and associated costs within the healthcare sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省东北部护士对暴力评估工具(VAT)使用的看法
工作场所暴力是卫生保健领域一个持续存在的问题。大多数病例是由患者、患者家属和朋友引起的。注册护士在医院的暴力行为导致56%的误工伤害,2018年,安大略省工作场所安全和保险委员会(WSIB)报告称,13%的误工伤害是由暴力造成的。公共服务健康和安全协会(PSHSA)创建了暴力评估工具(VAT),以预测急症护理机构中患者可能的暴力风险。卫生保健工作者可以使用增值税来评估风险,采取可能的控制措施并提高其安全性。作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,本研究的目的是探讨护士在评估潜在暴力风险时对增值税使用情况的看法,并确定增值税中存在的差距、挑战或需要改进的地方。将使用Sally Thorne在(2016)中设计的解释性描述研究。指导本研究的模型是工作场所暴力预防的Haddon矩阵框架。该研究将涉及三个焦点小组,通过缩放虚拟会议,每次会议有6至8名参与者,预计总共有18-24名参与者。焦点小组访谈将使用半结构化问题来指导安大略省东北部医院护士之间的讨论。解释性描述数据分析将以索恩的数据分析过程为指导。这将是第一项研究,以检查护士的增值税在安大略省的看法。本研究的结果将有助于确定增值税的预测有效性和任何可能需要的潜在变化。这项研究的结果可能导致减少医疗保健部门内的暴力和相关费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Body Mass Index Among ‎Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials Enhancing the care experiences of Black women along the breast cancer journey: Meaningfully engaging breast cancer survivors to co-create a targeted, culturally relevant resource hub Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review Exploring Experiences with Social Inclusion, Food Security and Housing Among People Living with HIV: A Qualitative Analysis Rethinking public health pedagogy: lessons learned and pertinent questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1