{"title":"Arbitration","authors":"M. Bundock","doi":"10.4324/9781351181525-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment rendered on March 6, 2018 by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Achmea case will no doubt generate considerable discussion. It relates to the compatibility of arbitration provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties with EU law in disputes between an investor from a Member State of the EU and another Member State of the EU, often called “intra-EU BIT claims”.","PeriodicalId":269779,"journal":{"name":"Shipping Law Handbook","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shipping Law Handbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181525-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The judgment rendered on March 6, 2018 by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Achmea case will no doubt generate considerable discussion. It relates to the compatibility of arbitration provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties with EU law in disputes between an investor from a Member State of the EU and another Member State of the EU, often called “intra-EU BIT claims”.