Fathers, others: The sacrificial victim in Freud, Girard, and Levinas

C. Davis
{"title":"Fathers, others: The sacrificial victim in Freud, Girard, and Levinas","authors":"C. Davis","doi":"10.1080/14797580009367194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper derives from an interest in murder. This interest began through reading fictional narratives which ceaselessly stage and restage scenes of murder; but it has also become clear that a range of theoretical texts are no less preoccupied with the basic question, ‘Why kill?’ (see Davis, 2000). In particular, the three theorists I shall discuss here, Freud, Girard and Levinas, directly address the question of murder, its causes and consequences. In each case, the theoretical question turns out to depend upon a minimal core narrative in which the stakes of murder are crystallized; rival theoretical accounts are thus also bound up in a competition of stories. As this paper traces a common concern from Freud's Totem and Taboo, through Girard's La Violence et le sacré, to Levinas's Totalité et infini, the question ‘Why kill?’ gets entangled with the dynamics of storytelling and the issue of what it means to do theory.","PeriodicalId":296129,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Values","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580009367194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract This paper derives from an interest in murder. This interest began through reading fictional narratives which ceaselessly stage and restage scenes of murder; but it has also become clear that a range of theoretical texts are no less preoccupied with the basic question, ‘Why kill?’ (see Davis, 2000). In particular, the three theorists I shall discuss here, Freud, Girard and Levinas, directly address the question of murder, its causes and consequences. In each case, the theoretical question turns out to depend upon a minimal core narrative in which the stakes of murder are crystallized; rival theoretical accounts are thus also bound up in a competition of stories. As this paper traces a common concern from Freud's Totem and Taboo, through Girard's La Violence et le sacré, to Levinas's Totalité et infini, the question ‘Why kill?’ gets entangled with the dynamics of storytelling and the issue of what it means to do theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父亲,他人:弗洛伊德、吉拉德和列维纳斯笔下的牺牲者
本文源于对谋杀的兴趣。这种兴趣开始于阅读不断上演和重演谋杀场景的虚构叙事;但也很明显,一系列理论文本同样关注的是一个基本问题:“为什么杀戮?”(参见Davis, 2000)。特别是,我将在这里讨论的三个理论家,弗洛伊德,吉拉德和列维纳斯,直接解决了谋杀的问题,它的原因和后果。在每一种情况下,理论问题都依赖于一个最小的核心叙事,在这个叙事中,谋杀的利害关系是明确的;因此,相互竞争的理论叙述也与故事的竞争联系在一起。从弗洛伊德的《图腾与禁忌》,到吉拉德的《暴力与祭祀》,再到列维纳斯的《极权与无限》,本文追溯了一个共同关注的问题:“为什么杀戮?”这个问题与讲故事的动态以及理论的意义等问题纠缠在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enjoy Your Fight! - Fight Club as a Symptom of the Network Society Empire and Utopia: A Psychoanalytic Critique of Totality October : La Glace sans tain Digital Dinosaurs and Artificial Life: Exploring the Culture of Nature in Computer and Video Games Being mondaine : Jean-Luc Nancy's Enumerations of the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1