October : La Glace sans tain

Peter E. D. Muir
{"title":"October : La Glace sans tain","authors":"Peter E. D. Muir","doi":"10.1080/1362517022000047343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers the beginnings of the journal October's critical practice and the significance of a work by Michel Foucault: “Ceci n'est pas une pipe”.1 The theoretical issues/problematics raised by this essay became key to future debates in and around October; the essay becoming something of an emblematic means by which October might be distinguishing from other visual art critical practices. The importance of Foucault's text in relation to October was revealed during correspondences with Rosalind Krauss in August 2001. Foucault's self-referential essay can be seen as crucial not only to Rosalind Krauss's intellectual development, but also to the continuing debate on the nature of text and image in which the journal would be involved. The spiralling interplay of Foucault's narrative, combined with Magritte's picture, might be interpreted as a metaphor for the mediations of post-structural visual criticism itself as its practitioners sought to institute language into the visual sign, a project that attempted to produce a theoretical rationale – and perhaps a justification – for images being treated as if they were texts; thus, paraphrasing Foucault, introducing into the plenitude of the image a certain disorder. Such a weaving together of representation and discourse is interpreted as the formation of a destabilizing dialectic, a dialectic that can be linked to the writings of October as it shifts its rhetorical locations (critical interventions) in an attempt to break down the normative pictorial and discursive frames of reference; becoming in essence a dedisciplinary and de-formative critical practice. This essay provides an outline of the determining conditions that led to the development of this “linguistic turn” and an associated reflection on Foucault's text that seeks to direct attention specifically towards its semiotic and discursive implications in relation to the developing oeuvre of criticism exemplified by the magazine. The essay is supported by interviews with Rosalind Krauss and Douglas Crimp conducted by the author in March 2002.","PeriodicalId":296129,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Values","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1362517022000047343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay considers the beginnings of the journal October's critical practice and the significance of a work by Michel Foucault: “Ceci n'est pas une pipe”.1 The theoretical issues/problematics raised by this essay became key to future debates in and around October; the essay becoming something of an emblematic means by which October might be distinguishing from other visual art critical practices. The importance of Foucault's text in relation to October was revealed during correspondences with Rosalind Krauss in August 2001. Foucault's self-referential essay can be seen as crucial not only to Rosalind Krauss's intellectual development, but also to the continuing debate on the nature of text and image in which the journal would be involved. The spiralling interplay of Foucault's narrative, combined with Magritte's picture, might be interpreted as a metaphor for the mediations of post-structural visual criticism itself as its practitioners sought to institute language into the visual sign, a project that attempted to produce a theoretical rationale – and perhaps a justification – for images being treated as if they were texts; thus, paraphrasing Foucault, introducing into the plenitude of the image a certain disorder. Such a weaving together of representation and discourse is interpreted as the formation of a destabilizing dialectic, a dialectic that can be linked to the writings of October as it shifts its rhetorical locations (critical interventions) in an attempt to break down the normative pictorial and discursive frames of reference; becoming in essence a dedisciplinary and de-formative critical practice. This essay provides an outline of the determining conditions that led to the development of this “linguistic turn” and an associated reflection on Foucault's text that seeks to direct attention specifically towards its semiotic and discursive implications in relation to the developing oeuvre of criticism exemplified by the magazine. The essay is supported by interviews with Rosalind Krauss and Douglas Crimp conducted by the author in March 2002.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十月:La Glace sans tain
本文考虑了《十月》杂志批判实践的开端,以及米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的一部作品的意义:“Ceci n'est pas une pipe”本文提出的理论问题成为未来10月及其前后辩论的关键;这篇文章成为了一种象征性的手段,通过这种手段,十月可能会与其他视觉艺术批评实践区别开来。2001年8月,福柯与罗莎琳德·克劳斯(Rosalind Krauss)的通信揭示了福柯文本与《十月》相关的重要性。福柯的自我指涉文章不仅对罗莎琳德·克劳斯的智力发展至关重要,而且对持续不断的关于文本和图像本质的辩论也至关重要,而这本杂志也将参与其中。福柯的叙事与马格利特的画面相结合的螺旋式相互作用,可以被解释为后结构视觉批评本身调解的隐喻,因为它的实践者试图将语言纳入视觉符号,这一项目试图为图像被视为文本提供理论依据——也许是正当理由;因此,套用福柯的话,将某种无序引入图像的丰富性。这种表现和话语的交织被解释为一种不稳定的辩证法的形成,这种辩证法可以与十月的作品联系起来,因为它改变了修辞位置(批判性干预),试图打破规范性的图像和话语的参考框架;本质上成为一种去学科化和去变形的批判实践。本文概述了导致这种“语言转向”发展的决定性条件,并对福柯的文本进行了相关的反思,旨在将注意力特别集中在与该杂志所例证的发展中的批评作品相关的符号学和话语含义上。这篇文章是由作者在2002年3月对罗莎琳德·克劳斯和道格拉斯·克里普进行的采访支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enjoy Your Fight! - Fight Club as a Symptom of the Network Society Empire and Utopia: A Psychoanalytic Critique of Totality October : La Glace sans tain Digital Dinosaurs and Artificial Life: Exploring the Culture of Nature in Computer and Video Games Being mondaine : Jean-Luc Nancy's Enumerations of the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1