Customer eXperience Evaluation Methodologies: A Literature Review

L. Rojas, Daniela Quiñones
{"title":"Customer eXperience Evaluation Methodologies: A Literature Review","authors":"L. Rojas, Daniela Quiñones","doi":"10.1145/3488392.3488398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) available to evaluate the Customer eXperience (CX), there is a dearth of CX evaluation methodologies. This research presents a review of 12 studies mainly related to methodologies and evaluation approaches within them that are used –or can be used as a reference– to evaluate the CX. We conduct a literature review of papers published on ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review was based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham (2007) and shows that: (1) there is a lack of formal CX evaluation methodologies; (2) CX studies reviewed do not consider factors, such as touchpoints, channels, and dimensions; (3) CX studies reviewed do not validate their stages and do not provide sufficient detail for both stages and evaluation approaches within them; and (4) it is possible to use methodologies from other domains to fill the shortcomings found in CX studies reviewed.","PeriodicalId":296023,"journal":{"name":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488392.3488398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) available to evaluate the Customer eXperience (CX), there is a dearth of CX evaluation methodologies. This research presents a review of 12 studies mainly related to methodologies and evaluation approaches within them that are used –or can be used as a reference– to evaluate the CX. We conduct a literature review of papers published on ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review was based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham (2007) and shows that: (1) there is a lack of formal CX evaluation methodologies; (2) CX studies reviewed do not consider factors, such as touchpoints, channels, and dimensions; (3) CX studies reviewed do not validate their stages and do not provide sufficient detail for both stages and evaluation approaches within them; and (4) it is possible to use methodologies from other domains to fill the shortcomings found in CX studies reviewed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顾客体验评价方法:文献综述
尽管有多种评估方法(方法、工具和工具)可用于评估客户体验(CX),但仍然缺乏客户体验评估方法。本研究对12项研究进行了回顾,这些研究主要涉及用于评估客户体验的方法和评估方法,或者可以作为参考。我们对发表在ScienceDirect、Scopus和Google Scholar上的论文进行文献综述。该审查基于Kitchenham(2007)提出的指导方针,并表明:(1)缺乏正式的客户体验评估方法;(2)客户体验研究未考虑接触点、渠道和维度等因素;(3)所审查的CX研究没有验证其阶段,也没有为两个阶段和其中的评估方法提供足够的细节;(4)有可能使用其他领域的方法来填补所审查的客户体验研究中发现的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction Digital Hand Tracking. Interacción sin contacto para la manipulación de imágenes diagnósticas en el quirófano Teaching Programming Using Cultural Viewpoint Metaphors Resignification Computational Thinking for Digital Culture Development: discussions based on a practical experience Women’s Health Digital Interventions in Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1