{"title":"Customer eXperience Evaluation Methodologies: A Literature Review","authors":"L. Rojas, Daniela Quiñones","doi":"10.1145/3488392.3488398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) available to evaluate the Customer eXperience (CX), there is a dearth of CX evaluation methodologies. This research presents a review of 12 studies mainly related to methodologies and evaluation approaches within them that are used –or can be used as a reference– to evaluate the CX. We conduct a literature review of papers published on ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review was based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham (2007) and shows that: (1) there is a lack of formal CX evaluation methodologies; (2) CX studies reviewed do not consider factors, such as touchpoints, channels, and dimensions; (3) CX studies reviewed do not validate their stages and do not provide sufficient detail for both stages and evaluation approaches within them; and (4) it is possible to use methodologies from other domains to fill the shortcomings found in CX studies reviewed.","PeriodicalId":296023,"journal":{"name":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488392.3488398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) available to evaluate the Customer eXperience (CX), there is a dearth of CX evaluation methodologies. This research presents a review of 12 studies mainly related to methodologies and evaluation approaches within them that are used –or can be used as a reference– to evaluate the CX. We conduct a literature review of papers published on ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review was based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham (2007) and shows that: (1) there is a lack of formal CX evaluation methodologies; (2) CX studies reviewed do not consider factors, such as touchpoints, channels, and dimensions; (3) CX studies reviewed do not validate their stages and do not provide sufficient detail for both stages and evaluation approaches within them; and (4) it is possible to use methodologies from other domains to fill the shortcomings found in CX studies reviewed.