Linear regression model with a randomly censored predictor:Estimation procedures

F. Atem, Roland A. Matsouaka
{"title":"Linear regression model with a randomly censored predictor:Estimation procedures","authors":"F. Atem, Roland A. Matsouaka","doi":"10.19080/BBOAJ.2017.01.555556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider linear regression model estimation where the covariate of interest is randomly censored. Under a non-informative censoring mechanism, one may obtain valid estimates by deleting censored observations. However, this comes at a cost of lost information and decreased efficiency, especially under heavy censoring. Other methods for dealing with censored covariates, such as ignoring censoring or replacing censored observations with a fixed number, often lead to severely biased results and are of limited practicality. Parametric methods based on maximum likelihood estimation as well as semiparametric and non-parametric methods have been successfully used in linear regression estimation with censored covariates where censoring is due to a limit of detection. \nIn this paper, we adapt some of these methods to handle randomly censored covariates and compare them under different scenarios to recently-developed semiparametric and nonparametric methods for randomly censored covariates. Specifically, we consider both dependent and independent randomly censored mechanisms as well as the impact of using a non-parametric algorithm on the distribution of the randomly censored covariate. Through extensive simulation studies, we compare the performance of these methods under different scenarios. Finally, we illustrate and compare the methods using the Framingham Health Study data to assess the association between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in offspring and parental age at onset of a clinically-diagnosed cardiovascular event.","PeriodicalId":409996,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Applications","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/BBOAJ.2017.01.555556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We consider linear regression model estimation where the covariate of interest is randomly censored. Under a non-informative censoring mechanism, one may obtain valid estimates by deleting censored observations. However, this comes at a cost of lost information and decreased efficiency, especially under heavy censoring. Other methods for dealing with censored covariates, such as ignoring censoring or replacing censored observations with a fixed number, often lead to severely biased results and are of limited practicality. Parametric methods based on maximum likelihood estimation as well as semiparametric and non-parametric methods have been successfully used in linear regression estimation with censored covariates where censoring is due to a limit of detection. In this paper, we adapt some of these methods to handle randomly censored covariates and compare them under different scenarios to recently-developed semiparametric and nonparametric methods for randomly censored covariates. Specifically, we consider both dependent and independent randomly censored mechanisms as well as the impact of using a non-parametric algorithm on the distribution of the randomly censored covariate. Through extensive simulation studies, we compare the performance of these methods under different scenarios. Finally, we illustrate and compare the methods using the Framingham Health Study data to assess the association between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in offspring and parental age at onset of a clinically-diagnosed cardiovascular event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有随机删减预测器的线性回归模型:估计程序
我们考虑线性回归模型估计,其中感兴趣的协变量是随机删减的。在非信息审查机制下,可以通过删除审查的观测值来获得有效的估计。然而,这是以丢失信息和降低效率为代价的,特别是在严格审查的情况下。处理审查协变量的其他方法,如忽略审查或用固定数量代替审查观测值,往往导致严重偏差的结果,实用性有限。基于极大似然估计的参数方法以及半参数和非参数方法已经成功地应用于带有删减协变量的线性回归估计中,其中删减是由于检测限制造成的。在本文中,我们采用其中的一些方法来处理随机截尾协变量,并将它们与最近发展的随机截尾协变量的半参数和非参数方法在不同情况下进行了比较。具体来说,我们考虑了依赖和独立随机审查机制,以及使用非参数算法对随机审查协变量分布的影响。通过广泛的仿真研究,我们比较了这些方法在不同场景下的性能。最后,我们用弗雷明汉健康研究的数据来说明和比较两种方法,以评估后代低密度脂蛋白(LDL)与父母在临床诊断的心血管事件发病时的年龄之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weekly Bayesian Modelling Strategy to Predict Deaths by COVID-19: a Model and Case Study for the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil Selecting the Most Effective Nudge: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment on Immunization Revealing the Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19: A Bayesian Framework for Rt Estimation Improving living biomass C-stock loss estimates by combining optical satellite, airborne laser scanning, and NFI data Bayesian classification for dating archaeological sites via projectile points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1