A comparison of bicubic and biquintic interpolators suitable for real-time hardware implementation

Jonathan Fry, M. Pusateri
{"title":"A comparison of bicubic and biquintic interpolators suitable for real-time hardware implementation","authors":"Jonathan Fry, M. Pusateri","doi":"10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital multispectral night vision goggles incorporate both imagers and displays that often have different resolutions. While both thermal imager and micro-display technologies continue to produce larger arrays, thermal imagers still lag well behind displays and can require interpolation by a factor of 2.5 in both horizontal and vertical directions. In goggle applications, resizing the imagery streams to the size of the display must occur in real-time with minimal latency. In addition to low latency, a resizing algorithm must produce acceptable imagery, necessitating an understanding of the resized image fidelity and spatial smoothness. While both spatial and spatial frequency domain resizing techniques are available, most spatial frequency techniques require a complete frame for operation introducing unacceptable latency. Spatial domain techniques can be implemented on a neighborhood basis allowing latencies equivalent to several row clock pulses to be achieved. We have already implemented bilinear re-sampling in hardware and, while bilinear re-sampling supports moderate up-sizes with reasonable image quality, its deficiencies are apparent at interpolation ratios of two and greater. We are developing hardware implementations of both bicubic and biquintic resizing algorithms. We present the results of comparison between hardware ready versions of the bicubic and biquintic algorithms with the existing bilinear. We also discuss the hardware requirements for bicubic and biquintic compared to the existing bilinear resizing.","PeriodicalId":266025,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Digital multispectral night vision goggles incorporate both imagers and displays that often have different resolutions. While both thermal imager and micro-display technologies continue to produce larger arrays, thermal imagers still lag well behind displays and can require interpolation by a factor of 2.5 in both horizontal and vertical directions. In goggle applications, resizing the imagery streams to the size of the display must occur in real-time with minimal latency. In addition to low latency, a resizing algorithm must produce acceptable imagery, necessitating an understanding of the resized image fidelity and spatial smoothness. While both spatial and spatial frequency domain resizing techniques are available, most spatial frequency techniques require a complete frame for operation introducing unacceptable latency. Spatial domain techniques can be implemented on a neighborhood basis allowing latencies equivalent to several row clock pulses to be achieved. We have already implemented bilinear re-sampling in hardware and, while bilinear re-sampling supports moderate up-sizes with reasonable image quality, its deficiencies are apparent at interpolation ratios of two and greater. We are developing hardware implementations of both bicubic and biquintic resizing algorithms. We present the results of comparison between hardware ready versions of the bicubic and biquintic algorithms with the existing bilinear. We also discuss the hardware requirements for bicubic and biquintic compared to the existing bilinear resizing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适合于实时硬件实现的双三次和双五次插值器的比较
数字多光谱夜视镜包括成像仪和显示器,通常具有不同的分辨率。虽然热成像仪和微显示技术都在继续生产更大的阵列,但热成像仪仍然远远落后于显示器,并且在水平和垂直方向上都需要2.5倍的插值。在谷歌眼镜应用程序中,将图像流的大小调整到显示器的大小必须以最小的延迟实时发生。除了低延迟外,调整大小算法还必须产生可接受的图像,这就需要了解调整后的图像保真度和空间平滑度。虽然空间和空间频域调整技术都是可用的,但大多数空间频率技术需要一个完整的操作框架,从而引入不可接受的延迟。空间域技术可以在邻域基础上实现,允许实现相当于几行时钟脉冲的延迟。我们已经在硬件上实现了双线性重采样,虽然双线性重采样支持适度的放大尺寸和合理的图像质量,但它的缺陷在插值比为2或更大时是明显的。我们正在开发双三次和双五次调整大小算法的硬件实现。我们给出了双三次和双五次算法的硬件版本与现有双线性算法的比较结果。我们还讨论了双三次和双五次调整与现有双线性调整的硬件要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image-based querying of urban photos and videos Large-scale functional models of visual cortex for remote sensing Overhead imagery research data set — an annotated data library & tools to aid in the development of computer vision algorithms 3D shape retrieval by visual parts similarity Kalman filter based video background estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1