The Problems of Scepticism

J. Doomen
{"title":"The Problems of Scepticism","authors":"J. Doomen","doi":"10.30965/26664275-01001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is focused on answering the question to what extent one is able to be a sceptic. Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Scepticism serves as a guide. In section 1, it is investigated whether three logical laws have a certain foundation or are subject to doubt. In section 2, Sextus’s way to deal with these laws is examined; the question arises how dogmatic his approach is. After that, a possible ‘reply’ by Sextus to the criticism receives attention. Section 3 is concentrated on a possible alternative to Sextus’s approach. Besides logical laws, some important methods are concerned.","PeriodicalId":218144,"journal":{"name":"Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/26664275-01001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is focused on answering the question to what extent one is able to be a sceptic. Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Scepticism serves as a guide. In section 1, it is investigated whether three logical laws have a certain foundation or are subject to doubt. In section 2, Sextus’s way to deal with these laws is examined; the question arises how dogmatic his approach is. After that, a possible ‘reply’ by Sextus to the criticism receives attention. Section 3 is concentrated on a possible alternative to Sextus’s approach. Besides logical laws, some important methods are concerned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀疑主义的问题
这篇文章的重点是回答一个人在多大程度上可以成为怀疑论者的问题。塞克斯图斯·恩里克乌斯的《怀疑主义纲要》就是一个指南。在第一节中,考察三个逻辑规律是否有一定的基础或是否值得怀疑。在第二节中,我们考察了塞克斯图斯处理这些法律的方法;问题是他的方法有多教条。在那之后,塞克斯图斯对批评的一个可能的“回复”受到了关注。第3节集中于塞克斯图斯方法的可能替代方案。除了逻辑规律外,还涉及到一些重要的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Value of Drunkenness in the Laws Contemporary social contract theory and Hegel's master/bondsman-relation Relational Space and Places of Value John Buridan's Sophismata and interval temporal semantics An Aristotelian Theory of Chemical Substance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1