Turkish Adaptation of Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center’s Revised Diabetes Knowledge Test and Determination of Factors Affecting the Knowledge Level of Diabetic Individuals

C. Idiz, S. Celik, Elif Bagdemir, M. Dişsiz, I. Satman
{"title":"Turkish Adaptation of Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center’s Revised Diabetes Knowledge Test and Determination of Factors Affecting the Knowledge Level of Diabetic Individuals","authors":"C. Idiz, S. Celik, Elif Bagdemir, M. Dişsiz, I. Satman","doi":"10.25179/tjem.2019-71974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Education is the cornerstone of diabetes management, and numerous educational studies used Diabetes Knowledge Level Tests to determine the effectiveness of education. Our study was planned to adopt the revised Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2) of the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center for the Turkish population. Material and Methods: A total of 296 diabetic subjects using insulin were included in the study. After the determination of the validity of the language and content of the test, it was applied to the patients. The reliability of the study was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results of the DKT2 demographic values, and laboratory tests of the patients were noted. Results: Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.60, 0.59, and 0.70 for the first part, second part, and complete test, respectively. The test-retest reliability values were 0.76 and 0.87 (p<0.001), respectively. The correct response rate to the first part was 32.68±2.47% in patients with Type 1 diabetes and 32.16±2.66% in patients with Type 2 diabetes using insulin. The correct response rate to the second part was 19.68±2.05% and 19.55±2.96%, respectively. Discussion: The Turkish adapted version of DKT2 is a reliable tool to measure patients’ level of diabetes knowledge. However, in order to increase the level of knowledge of the patients, education of diabetes should be improved.","PeriodicalId":425605,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25179/tjem.2019-71974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Education is the cornerstone of diabetes management, and numerous educational studies used Diabetes Knowledge Level Tests to determine the effectiveness of education. Our study was planned to adopt the revised Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2) of the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center for the Turkish population. Material and Methods: A total of 296 diabetic subjects using insulin were included in the study. After the determination of the validity of the language and content of the test, it was applied to the patients. The reliability of the study was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results of the DKT2 demographic values, and laboratory tests of the patients were noted. Results: Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.60, 0.59, and 0.70 for the first part, second part, and complete test, respectively. The test-retest reliability values were 0.76 and 0.87 (p<0.001), respectively. The correct response rate to the first part was 32.68±2.47% in patients with Type 1 diabetes and 32.16±2.66% in patients with Type 2 diabetes using insulin. The correct response rate to the second part was 19.68±2.05% and 19.55±2.96%, respectively. Discussion: The Turkish adapted version of DKT2 is a reliable tool to measure patients’ level of diabetes knowledge. However, in order to increase the level of knowledge of the patients, education of diabetes should be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其对密歇根糖尿病研究培训中心修订后的糖尿病知识测试的适应和糖尿病个体知识水平影响因素的确定
目的:教育是糖尿病管理的基石,许多教育研究使用糖尿病知识水平测试来确定教育的有效性。我们的研究计划采用密歇根糖尿病研究和培训中心针对土耳其人群修订的糖尿病知识测试(DKT2)。材料与方法:共纳入296例使用胰岛素的糖尿病患者。在确定语言和测试内容的效度后,将其应用于患者。本研究的信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数进行评估。记录患者的DKT2人口学值和实验室检查结果。结果:第一部分、第二部分和完整检验的Cronbach’s alpha值分别为0.60、0.59和0.70。重测信度值分别为0.76、0.87 (p<0.001)。1型糖尿病患者对第一部分的正确反应率为32.68±2.47%,2型糖尿病患者对第一部分的正确反应率为32.16±2.66%。第二部分的正确率分别为19.68±2.05%和19.55±2.96%。讨论:土耳其版的DKT2是衡量患者糖尿病知识水平的可靠工具。然而,为了提高患者的知识水平,应加强对糖尿病的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-Based Medicine or Patient-Directed Treatment? Comparison of Screening Strategies for Bone Mineral Density Measurement Overlapping Between Thymus Neuroendocrine Carcinoma as an Ectopic Cushing Syndrome and Exogenous Cushing’s Syndrome: A Case Report Postpartum Metabolic Outcomes and Related Factors in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus History A Case of Plurihormonal Pituitary Giant Macroadenoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1