Size and Investment Performance: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Pension Plans

D. Jang, Youchang Wu
{"title":"Size and Investment Performance: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Pension Plans","authors":"D. Jang, Youchang Wu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3697711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the investment performance of over 160 thousand U.S. private pension plans. We find significant economies of scale in performance and administrative expenses, which are more prominent for defined benefit (DB) than for defined contribution (DC) plans. Small DC plans outperform size-matched DB plans in all the performance measures we consider, but the majority of both types underperform passive benchmarks. Size also drives the plan termination probability and plan sponsors' choice of the pension plan structure. Our results highlight the inefficiency of small DB plans, consistent with the secular shift toward DC plans and the recent trend of consolidation.","PeriodicalId":398666,"journal":{"name":"FinPlanRN: 401(k) & 403(k) Plans (Topic)","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FinPlanRN: 401(k) & 403(k) Plans (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3697711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We examine the investment performance of over 160 thousand U.S. private pension plans. We find significant economies of scale in performance and administrative expenses, which are more prominent for defined benefit (DB) than for defined contribution (DC) plans. Small DC plans outperform size-matched DB plans in all the performance measures we consider, but the majority of both types underperform passive benchmarks. Size also drives the plan termination probability and plan sponsors' choice of the pension plan structure. Our results highlight the inefficiency of small DB plans, consistent with the secular shift toward DC plans and the recent trend of consolidation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规模与投资绩效:固定收益与固定缴款养老金计划
我们研究了超过16万个美国私人养老金计划的投资表现。我们发现,在绩效和管理费用方面存在显著的规模经济效应,这在固定收益(DB)计划中比在固定缴款(DC)计划中更为突出。小型DC计划在我们考虑的所有性能指标中都优于大小匹配的DB计划,但这两种类型的大多数都不如被动基准。规模也影响计划终止概率和计划发起人对养老金计划结构的选择。我们的研究结果突出了小型固定缴款计划的低效率,这与长期向固定缴款计划的转变以及最近的整合趋势是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size and Investment Performance: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Pension Plans The Effects of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 on Defined Benefit Pension Contributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1