Do R&D and marketing departments perceive innovation fundamentals through the same lenses?

Andreia C. T. D. Pereira, J. Sequeira
{"title":"Do R&D and marketing departments perceive innovation fundamentals through the same lenses?","authors":"Andreia C. T. D. Pereira, J. Sequeira","doi":"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Todaypsilas competitive world, no matter what industry we are considering, has innovation as a key element for the survival and growth of firms. The product development process tends to be central to the sustainability of firms, emerging the need of top management and the different departments to focus on innovation and to perceive this same objective as a common path which has to be taken together. The literature stresses that Marketing and R&D, the leading departments on the innovation process within firms, have to work jointly to achieve the market success of the innovative product. Usually, this stream of the literature discusses the integration issue focusing essentially on the outcomes - failure/success factors of the innovation process - derived from the (lack of) integration between these departments. In the present paper we assess how close are the perceptions of these departments on the innovation process through the use of an innovation audit. To our knowledge, no study has used the innovation audit to assess the integration of Marketing and R&D departments. The study was applied to a set of key actors within the Marketing and R&D departments of a Portuguese beverage firm. Being a case study, due to the limitation of its sample, it evidences an actual divergence of global perceptions regarding to the firmpsilas innovation process and performance. These results highlights the need for departmentspsila integration not only on the outcomes, but they also indicate that a big effort should be employed in order to close perceptionpsilas gaps on Strategy, Process, Linkages, Learning and Organization, i.e. the fundamentals of innovation, namely by improving intra- and interdepartmental communication.","PeriodicalId":408691,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Todaypsilas competitive world, no matter what industry we are considering, has innovation as a key element for the survival and growth of firms. The product development process tends to be central to the sustainability of firms, emerging the need of top management and the different departments to focus on innovation and to perceive this same objective as a common path which has to be taken together. The literature stresses that Marketing and R&D, the leading departments on the innovation process within firms, have to work jointly to achieve the market success of the innovative product. Usually, this stream of the literature discusses the integration issue focusing essentially on the outcomes - failure/success factors of the innovation process - derived from the (lack of) integration between these departments. In the present paper we assess how close are the perceptions of these departments on the innovation process through the use of an innovation audit. To our knowledge, no study has used the innovation audit to assess the integration of Marketing and R&D departments. The study was applied to a set of key actors within the Marketing and R&D departments of a Portuguese beverage firm. Being a case study, due to the limitation of its sample, it evidences an actual divergence of global perceptions regarding to the firmpsilas innovation process and performance. These results highlights the need for departmentspsila integration not only on the outcomes, but they also indicate that a big effort should be employed in order to close perceptionpsilas gaps on Strategy, Process, Linkages, Learning and Organization, i.e. the fundamentals of innovation, namely by improving intra- and interdepartmental communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发和营销部门是否通过同样的视角看待创新的基本原理?
在当今竞争激烈的世界,无论我们考虑哪个行业,创新都是企业生存和发展的关键因素。产品开发过程往往是公司可持续发展的核心,出现了最高管理层和不同部门关注创新的需要,并将这一目标视为一条必须共同采取的共同道路。文献强调,企业创新过程的主导部门——市场营销和研发部门必须共同努力,才能使创新产品在市场上取得成功。通常,这类文献讨论的整合问题主要集中在结果上——创新过程的失败/成功因素——源于这些部门之间(缺乏)整合。在本文中,我们通过使用创新审计来评估这些部门对创新过程的看法有多接近。据我们所知,还没有研究使用创新审计来评估营销和研发部门的整合。该研究被应用于葡萄牙饮料公司营销和研发部门的一组关键参与者。作为一个案例研究,由于样本的局限性,它证明了全球对企业创新过程和绩效的看法存在实际分歧。这些结果强调了部门之间不仅需要在结果上进行整合,而且还表明,应该通过改善部门内部和部门间的沟通,努力缩小在战略、流程、联系、学习和组织(即创新的基础)方面的认知差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth, energy technologies and evaluation context of scenarios: methodological considerations illustrated to the Corsican insular region An application of MACRAME to support a multiunit project Operations and supply chain management Patent analysis for technology forecasting: Sector-specific applications New perspectives on industry transformation through expansion of the technology base and creative cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1