{"title":"Uma análise do contexto de formação do PNAIC na rede estadual de ensino em Rolim e Moura/RO: mãos que ensinam; olhares outros; o chão da escola","authors":"J. Matias, Josemir Almeida Barros","doi":"10.20396/RHO.V21I00.8655268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research has as one of the objectives to analyze the teaching perspective regarding the conciliation of school routine and the continued formation of the National Pact for Literacy in the Right Age (PNAIC), and if the program changed the educational data of the school (locus) of the research. The sources are the results of questionnaires and interviews with the teachers participating in the training, who also work in the school (locus) of the research. Also included in the repertoire of sources are legislation, statistical and school data that were collected through searches on sites of the Ministry of Education (MEC), the National Institute of Research and Education (INEP) and the Rondonia Secretariat of Education (SEDUC / RO). The teaching perspectives found in the analysis processes demonstrate divergent points, but reaffirm the continuity of the theoretical references already known in previous educational formations and fomented by the federal government. They demonstrate the need and satisfaction of literacy teachers to be together at the time of training in the midst of the constant adaptation of the school routine to enable meetings at opposite working hours and that, in some cases, as teachers of 25 hours, exceed their contractual hours . The results of the Basic Education Development Index (IDEB) of the school (locus) were confronted with other sources such as the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) and educational policies that show a contradiction in the calculation for the achievement of results. All this may contribute to the fact that the indexes do not fully reveal the educational reality of the researched school.","PeriodicalId":230861,"journal":{"name":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/RHO.V21I00.8655268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present research has as one of the objectives to analyze the teaching perspective regarding the conciliation of school routine and the continued formation of the National Pact for Literacy in the Right Age (PNAIC), and if the program changed the educational data of the school (locus) of the research. The sources are the results of questionnaires and interviews with the teachers participating in the training, who also work in the school (locus) of the research. Also included in the repertoire of sources are legislation, statistical and school data that were collected through searches on sites of the Ministry of Education (MEC), the National Institute of Research and Education (INEP) and the Rondonia Secretariat of Education (SEDUC / RO). The teaching perspectives found in the analysis processes demonstrate divergent points, but reaffirm the continuity of the theoretical references already known in previous educational formations and fomented by the federal government. They demonstrate the need and satisfaction of literacy teachers to be together at the time of training in the midst of the constant adaptation of the school routine to enable meetings at opposite working hours and that, in some cases, as teachers of 25 hours, exceed their contractual hours . The results of the Basic Education Development Index (IDEB) of the school (locus) were confronted with other sources such as the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) and educational policies that show a contradiction in the calculation for the achievement of results. All this may contribute to the fact that the indexes do not fully reveal the educational reality of the researched school.