Neuromuscular Blockade, Bariatric Surgeon Satisfaction, and Quality of Patient Recovery

P. Garneau, F. Garofalo, V. Deslauriers, S. Bacon, R. Denis, R. Pescarus, H. Atlas, M. Delisle, I. Tremblay
{"title":"Neuromuscular Blockade, Bariatric Surgeon Satisfaction, and Quality of Patient Recovery","authors":"P. Garneau, F. Garofalo, V. Deslauriers, S. Bacon, R. Denis, R. Pescarus, H. Atlas, M. Delisle, I. Tremblay","doi":"10.5812/MINSURGERY.44931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To date, little is known about neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and its impact in bariatric surgery and patient recovery. The goal of this study was to better assess the relationship between depth of NMB, bariatric surgeon’s satisfaction, and the quality of patient recovery. Methods: Between January and September 2015, we did a prospective observational study of 50 morbidly obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) under general anesthesia at our ambulatory surgical center. Rocuronium was used for tracheal intubation with bolus doses to maintain NMB. NMB was monitored at 5 minute intervals during the surgery, and at 30 second intervals following the reversal agent. The surgeon was blind to all anesthesia procedures and scored the surgical working conditions at 15 min intervals. Demographic data, operative data, and conditions were analyzed. Results: 42 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 38.8 years (range: 19 to 60, standard deviation (SD):±9.2), and mean BMI of 43.9 (range: 36 to 58, SD:± 5.1), underwent a LSG. Mean total surgical time was 63 minutes (range: 35 to 128). During the laparoscopic part of the surgery, 22% of the patients were in deep block and 78% were in moderate block. Six patients presented “poor” or “extremely poor” surgical conditions, and 6 patients had a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure. None of these patients were in deep block at that time. Patients in deep NMB had a shorter laparoscopic time (37 minutes, SD ± 7.1 vs 53 minutes, SD ± 18.3; P = 0.006). Conclusions: This study found that deep NMB prevents inappropriate abdominal cavity movement, consequently improving the operating area and the surgeon satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"538 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.44931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: To date, little is known about neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and its impact in bariatric surgery and patient recovery. The goal of this study was to better assess the relationship between depth of NMB, bariatric surgeon’s satisfaction, and the quality of patient recovery. Methods: Between January and September 2015, we did a prospective observational study of 50 morbidly obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) under general anesthesia at our ambulatory surgical center. Rocuronium was used for tracheal intubation with bolus doses to maintain NMB. NMB was monitored at 5 minute intervals during the surgery, and at 30 second intervals following the reversal agent. The surgeon was blind to all anesthesia procedures and scored the surgical working conditions at 15 min intervals. Demographic data, operative data, and conditions were analyzed. Results: 42 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 38.8 years (range: 19 to 60, standard deviation (SD):±9.2), and mean BMI of 43.9 (range: 36 to 58, SD:± 5.1), underwent a LSG. Mean total surgical time was 63 minutes (range: 35 to 128). During the laparoscopic part of the surgery, 22% of the patients were in deep block and 78% were in moderate block. Six patients presented “poor” or “extremely poor” surgical conditions, and 6 patients had a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure. None of these patients were in deep block at that time. Patients in deep NMB had a shorter laparoscopic time (37 minutes, SD ± 7.1 vs 53 minutes, SD ± 18.3; P = 0.006). Conclusions: This study found that deep NMB prevents inappropriate abdominal cavity movement, consequently improving the operating area and the surgeon satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经肌肉阻滞,减肥外科医生的满意度和病人康复的质量
背景:迄今为止,关于神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)及其对减肥手术和患者康复的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是更好地评估NMB深度、减肥外科医生的满意度和患者康复质量之间的关系。方法:2015年1月至9月,我们对50例在门诊手术中心全麻下行选择性腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)的病态肥胖患者进行前瞻性观察研究。罗库溴铵用于气管插管,大剂量维持NMB。手术期间每隔5分钟监测一次NMB,使用逆转剂后每隔30秒监测一次NMB。外科医生对所有麻醉过程一无所知,每隔15分钟对手术工作条件进行评分。分析了人口统计学资料、手术资料和手术条件。结果:42例女性,8例男性,平均年龄38.8岁(范围:19 ~ 60岁,标准差(SD)±9.2),平均BMI 43.9(范围:36 ~ 58,SD:±5.1)行LSG。平均总手术时间为63分钟(范围:35 ~ 128分钟)。在腹腔镜部分手术中,22%的患者处于深度阻滞状态,78%的患者处于中度阻滞状态。6例患者手术条件“差”或“极差”,6例患者出现腹内压突然升高。这些患者当时都没有深度阻滞。深度NMB患者的腹腔镜时间较短(37分钟,SD±7.1 vs 53分钟,SD±18.3;P = 0.006)。结论:本研究发现,深部NMB可防止不适当的腹腔运动,从而提高手术面积和外科医生的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Key Methods to Increase the Success Rate of Endoscopic Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Case Report and Review of Literature Meshoma, a Rare Complication of Abdomen and Hernia Repair-A Case Report Successful Removal of a Pulmonary Foreign Body Using C-Arm-Guided Flexible Bronchoscopy from Distal Airways of a Seven-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report Rectal Indomethacin Versus Rectal Diclofenac Sodium for Reducing Pain Associated with Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1