MADERA

Privada Antenor Orrego, F. Ingeniería, Alexandra Jimena Figueroa, Privada Antenor Orrego, Í. Contenido
{"title":"MADERA","authors":"Privada Antenor Orrego, F. Ingeniería, Alexandra Jimena Figueroa, Privada Antenor Orrego, Í. Contenido","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv25dh3qt.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, we seek to improve certain properties of concrete that influence its useful life, which is why this work compared resistance to abrasion wear in concrete samples formed by two types of material, wood and metal; thinking that the variation in concrete strength due to the type of formwork occurs in surface layers and occurs in very small dimensions, so that a compression test of this type is not feasible. In order to analyze this factor, we have taken as reference the Guatemalan Technical Standard 41087 and the ASTM C799 Standard; These test methods simulate the abrasive actions to which the concrete is exposed throughout its useful life. However, not having such mechanisms, we proceeded to create and design a system based on the previous standards in accordance with our limitations, which simulated abrasive actions by friction in the surface layers of our test tubes subjected to different types of formwork. With the information collected from the trials, we proceeded to evaluate them by means of descriptive statistics, achieving the percentages that differentiate the influence of the material with which the concrete is formed, due to the calorific contribution, which contrasted with our initial hypothesis. The main objective was to demonstrate that the steel as a formwork material absorbed part of the heat that the concrete emits at an early age; and being the wood a non-conductive material of heat, it benefited the concrete during its setting. However, our results showed that there is 37% more surface wear and 25% more weight loss during the test in samples with a water-cement ratio of 0.65 for wooden formwork, compared to metal ones; and for samples with a water-cement ratio of 0.61, 18% more surface wear and 10% more weight loss were obtained during the test in which they were veneered with wood, in comparison with those of steel formwork. The following is a series of techniques and data collection instruments that we have implemented throughout this investigation, and we invite you to make more inquiries about the abrasion resistance of the concrete.","PeriodicalId":430375,"journal":{"name":"Estructuras desde la materialidad","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estructuras desde la materialidad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25dh3qt.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Currently, we seek to improve certain properties of concrete that influence its useful life, which is why this work compared resistance to abrasion wear in concrete samples formed by two types of material, wood and metal; thinking that the variation in concrete strength due to the type of formwork occurs in surface layers and occurs in very small dimensions, so that a compression test of this type is not feasible. In order to analyze this factor, we have taken as reference the Guatemalan Technical Standard 41087 and the ASTM C799 Standard; These test methods simulate the abrasive actions to which the concrete is exposed throughout its useful life. However, not having such mechanisms, we proceeded to create and design a system based on the previous standards in accordance with our limitations, which simulated abrasive actions by friction in the surface layers of our test tubes subjected to different types of formwork. With the information collected from the trials, we proceeded to evaluate them by means of descriptive statistics, achieving the percentages that differentiate the influence of the material with which the concrete is formed, due to the calorific contribution, which contrasted with our initial hypothesis. The main objective was to demonstrate that the steel as a formwork material absorbed part of the heat that the concrete emits at an early age; and being the wood a non-conductive material of heat, it benefited the concrete during its setting. However, our results showed that there is 37% more surface wear and 25% more weight loss during the test in samples with a water-cement ratio of 0.65 for wooden formwork, compared to metal ones; and for samples with a water-cement ratio of 0.61, 18% more surface wear and 10% more weight loss were obtained during the test in which they were veneered with wood, in comparison with those of steel formwork. The following is a series of techniques and data collection instruments that we have implemented throughout this investigation, and we invite you to make more inquiries about the abrasion resistance of the concrete.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木材
目前,我们试图改善影响其使用寿命的混凝土的某些特性,这就是为什么这项工作比较了两种材料(木材和金属)形成的混凝土样品的耐磨性;认为由于模板类型引起的混凝土强度变化发生在表层,并且发生在非常小的尺寸上,因此这种类型的压缩试验是不可行的。为了分析这一因素,我们参考了危地马拉技术标准41087和ASTM C799标准;这些试验方法模拟混凝土在其整个使用寿命期间所受到的磨蚀作用。然而,由于没有这样的机制,我们根据我们的局限性,根据先前的标准创建和设计了一个系统,该系统通过在不同类型模板下的试管表层摩擦来模拟磨料作用。根据从试验中收集到的信息,我们通过描述性统计方法对试验进行了评估,得出了与我们最初的假设相反的、区分混凝土所用材料对热量贡献的影响的百分比。主要目的是为了证明作为模板材料的钢材在早期吸收了混凝土散发的部分热量;由于木材是一种不导电的热材料,它有利于混凝土的凝结。然而,我们的结果表明,与金属模板相比,在水灰比为0.65的样品中,木模板的表面磨损要多37%,重量损失要多25%;对于水灰比为0.61的样品,与钢模板相比,木模板的表面磨损增加了18%,重量损失增加了10%。以下是我们在整个调查过程中实施的一系列技术和数据收集工具,我们邀请您对混凝土的耐磨性进行更多的询问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONCRETO METAL MADERA ESTRUCTURAS ESPECIALES INTRODUCCIÓN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1