Experimental Validation of Multi-fidelity Models for Prognostics of Electromechanical Actuators

L. Baldo, P. Berri, M. D. Dalla Vedova, P. Maggiore
{"title":"Experimental Validation of Multi-fidelity Models for Prognostics of Electromechanical Actuators","authors":"L. Baldo, P. Berri, M. D. Dalla Vedova, P. Maggiore","doi":"10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing adoption of electrical energy as a secondary form of onboard power leads to an increase of electromechanical actuators (EMAs) use in aerospace applications. Therefore, innovative prognostic and diagnostic methodologies are becoming a fundamental tool to early identify faults propagation, prevent performance degradation, and ensure an acceptable level of safety and reliability of the system. Furthermore, prognostics entails further advantages, including a better ability to plan the maintenance of the various equipment, manage the warehouse and maintenance personnel, and a reduction in system management costs.\nFrequently, such approaches require the development of typologies of numerical models capable of simulating the performance of the EMA with different levels of fidelity: monitoring models, suitably simplified to combine speed and accuracy with reduced computational costs, and high fidelity models (and high computational intensity), to generate databases, develop predictive algorithms and train machine learning surrogates. Because of this, the authors developed a high-fidelity multi-domain numerical model (HF) capable of accounting for a variety of physical phenomena and gradual failures in the EMA, as well as a low-fidelity counterpart (LF). This simplified model is derived by the HF and intended for monitoring applications. While maintaining a low computing cost, LF is fault sensitive and can simulate the system position, speed, and equivalent phase currents.\nThese models have been validated using a dedicated EMA test bench, designed and implemented by authors. The HF model can simulate the operation of the actuator in nominal conditions as well as in the presence of incipient mechanical faults, such as a variation in friction and an increase of backlash in the reduction gearbox.\nComparing the preliminary results highlights satisfactory consistency between the experimental test bench and the two numerical models proposed by the authors.","PeriodicalId":422825,"journal":{"name":"PHM Society European Conference","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHM Society European Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The growing adoption of electrical energy as a secondary form of onboard power leads to an increase of electromechanical actuators (EMAs) use in aerospace applications. Therefore, innovative prognostic and diagnostic methodologies are becoming a fundamental tool to early identify faults propagation, prevent performance degradation, and ensure an acceptable level of safety and reliability of the system. Furthermore, prognostics entails further advantages, including a better ability to plan the maintenance of the various equipment, manage the warehouse and maintenance personnel, and a reduction in system management costs. Frequently, such approaches require the development of typologies of numerical models capable of simulating the performance of the EMA with different levels of fidelity: monitoring models, suitably simplified to combine speed and accuracy with reduced computational costs, and high fidelity models (and high computational intensity), to generate databases, develop predictive algorithms and train machine learning surrogates. Because of this, the authors developed a high-fidelity multi-domain numerical model (HF) capable of accounting for a variety of physical phenomena and gradual failures in the EMA, as well as a low-fidelity counterpart (LF). This simplified model is derived by the HF and intended for monitoring applications. While maintaining a low computing cost, LF is fault sensitive and can simulate the system position, speed, and equivalent phase currents. These models have been validated using a dedicated EMA test bench, designed and implemented by authors. The HF model can simulate the operation of the actuator in nominal conditions as well as in the presence of incipient mechanical faults, such as a variation in friction and an increase of backlash in the reduction gearbox. Comparing the preliminary results highlights satisfactory consistency between the experimental test bench and the two numerical models proposed by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机电执行器多保真度预测模型的实验验证
越来越多地采用电能作为机载动力的第二种形式,导致机电致动器(ema)在航空航天应用中的使用增加。因此,创新的预测和诊断方法正在成为早期识别故障传播,防止性能下降,并确保系统达到可接受的安全性和可靠性水平的基本工具。此外,预测带来了更多的优势,包括更好地计划各种设备的维护,管理仓库和维护人员,以及减少系统管理成本。通常,这种方法需要开发能够以不同保真度模拟EMA性能的数值模型类型:监测模型,适当简化以将速度和准确性与降低的计算成本相结合,以及高保真度模型(和高计算强度),以生成数据库,开发预测算法和训练机器学习替代品。因此,作者开发了一个高保真多域数值模型(HF),能够解释EMA中的各种物理现象和逐渐失效,以及一个低保真对应(LF)。这个简化模型是由高频导出的,用于监测应用。在保持较低的计算成本的同时,LF具有故障敏感性,可以模拟系统的位置、速度和等效相电流。这些模型已通过专门的EMA测试台进行验证,该测试台由作者设计和实现。高频模型可以模拟执行器在标称条件下的操作,以及在出现早期机械故障的情况下的操作,例如摩擦的变化和减速箱中隙隙的增加。初步结果对比表明,实验台架与作者提出的两种数值模型具有较好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Certainty Groups: A Practical Approach to Distinguish Confidence Levels in Neural Networks Domain Knowledge Informed Unsupervised Fault Detection for Rolling Element Bearings Novel Methodology for Health Assessment in Printed Circuit Boards On the Integration of Fundamental Knowledge about Degradation Processes into Data-Driven Diagnostics and Prognostics Using Theory-Guided Data Science Long Horizon Anomaly Prediction in Multivariate Time Series with Causal Autoencoders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1