{"title":"Processing Narrative Coherence: Towards a Top-Down Model of Discourse","authors":"Erica Cosentino, I. Adornetti, F. Ferretti","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of discourse and narration elaborated within the classical \ncompositional framework have been characterized as bottom-up models, \naccording to which discourse analysis proceeds incrementally, from \nphrase and sentence local meaning to discourse global meaning. In this \npaper we will argue against these models. Assuming as a case study the \nissue of discourse coherence, we suggest that the assessment of \ncoherence is a top-down process, in which the construction of a \nsituational interpretation at the global meaning level guides local \nmeaning analysis. In support of our hypothesis, we explore the role of \nexecutive functions (brain functions involved in planning and \norganization of goal-oriented behaviors) in coherence's establishment, \ndiscussing the results of several studies on narrative abilities of \npatients with brain injuries. We suggest that, compared to other \nmodels of discourse processing focused on comprehension, our model is \na viable candidate for an integrated account of discourse \ncomprehension and production.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Models of discourse and narration elaborated within the classical
compositional framework have been characterized as bottom-up models,
according to which discourse analysis proceeds incrementally, from
phrase and sentence local meaning to discourse global meaning. In this
paper we will argue against these models. Assuming as a case study the
issue of discourse coherence, we suggest that the assessment of
coherence is a top-down process, in which the construction of a
situational interpretation at the global meaning level guides local
meaning analysis. In support of our hypothesis, we explore the role of
executive functions (brain functions involved in planning and
organization of goal-oriented behaviors) in coherence's establishment,
discussing the results of several studies on narrative abilities of
patients with brain injuries. We suggest that, compared to other
models of discourse processing focused on comprehension, our model is
a viable candidate for an integrated account of discourse
comprehension and production.