Comparative Study of PI, PID controller for Buck-Boost Converter tuned by Bio-Inspired Optimization Techniques

K. Panduranga Vittal, Sayantan Bhanja, Abhijit Keshri
{"title":"Comparative Study of PI, PID controller for Buck-Boost Converter tuned by Bio-Inspired Optimization Techniques","authors":"K. Panduranga Vittal, Sayantan Bhanja, Abhijit Keshri","doi":"10.1109/DISCOVER52564.2021.9663591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the Buck-Boost converter was modelled using state-space averaging approach and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink. Buck-Boost converter with closed loop control, operated with PI and also with PID controller for good voltage regulation. Bio-inspired optimization techniques e.g. GreyWolves optimization Technique (GWO), Genetic Algorithm(GA), Particle Swarm optimization (PSO), Ant-Lion optimization (ALO), Whale optimization Algorithm (WOA) were used for tuning PI and also PID controller based Buck-Boost Converter. In order to find out the performances of PI and PID in the Buck-Boost converter, comparison between optimal values of PI parameters $(\\text{K}_{\\text{p}},\\ \\text{K}_{\\text{i}})$ and PID parameters $(\\text{K}_{\\text{p}},\\ \\text{K}_{\\text{i}},\\ \\text{K}_{\\text{d}})$ obtained by all the above mentioned optimization techniques were performed. The transient behaviour for each optimal values of PI and PID controller was investigated when the system subjected to a load disturbance. Also, for each optimal PI and PID controller error performance indices e.g. Integral Squared Error and Integral Absolute Error were evaluated. The comparison proved that the PID is most suitable controller for Buck-Boost Converter as it is damping out the oscillations caused due to load disturbance 87.56% faster than PI controller. Moreover, based on the evaluated values of error performance indices and dynamic behaviour, it has also been proven that GA is best optimization technique among others for tuning PID in a Buck-Boost Converter.","PeriodicalId":413789,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DISCOVER52564.2021.9663591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper the Buck-Boost converter was modelled using state-space averaging approach and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink. Buck-Boost converter with closed loop control, operated with PI and also with PID controller for good voltage regulation. Bio-inspired optimization techniques e.g. GreyWolves optimization Technique (GWO), Genetic Algorithm(GA), Particle Swarm optimization (PSO), Ant-Lion optimization (ALO), Whale optimization Algorithm (WOA) were used for tuning PI and also PID controller based Buck-Boost Converter. In order to find out the performances of PI and PID in the Buck-Boost converter, comparison between optimal values of PI parameters $(\text{K}_{\text{p}},\ \text{K}_{\text{i}})$ and PID parameters $(\text{K}_{\text{p}},\ \text{K}_{\text{i}},\ \text{K}_{\text{d}})$ obtained by all the above mentioned optimization techniques were performed. The transient behaviour for each optimal values of PI and PID controller was investigated when the system subjected to a load disturbance. Also, for each optimal PI and PID controller error performance indices e.g. Integral Squared Error and Integral Absolute Error were evaluated. The comparison proved that the PID is most suitable controller for Buck-Boost Converter as it is damping out the oscillations caused due to load disturbance 87.56% faster than PI controller. Moreover, based on the evaluated values of error performance indices and dynamic behaviour, it has also been proven that GA is best optimization technique among others for tuning PID in a Buck-Boost Converter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿生优化技术的Buck-Boost变换器PI、PID控制器的比较研究
本文采用状态空间平均法对Buck-Boost变换器进行了建模,并在MATLAB/Simulink中进行了仿真。Buck-Boost变换器采用闭环控制,采用PI控制和PID控制,具有良好的电压调节效果。生物优化技术,如灰狼优化技术(GWO),遗传算法(GA),粒子群优化(PSO),蚁狮优化(ALO),鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)被用于调整PI和基于PID控制器的Buck-Boost转换器。为了了解Buck-Boost变换器中PI和PID的性能,对PI参数$(\text{K}_{\text{p}}、\text{K}_{\text{i}})$和PID参数$(\text{K}_{\text{p}}、\text{i}}、\text{K}_{\text{d}})$的最优值进行了比较。研究了当系统受到负载扰动时,PI和PID控制器各最优值的暂态行为。此外,对于每个最优PI和PID控制器的误差性能指标,如积分平方误差和积分绝对误差进行了评估。结果表明,PID控制比PI控制对负载扰动产生的振荡的抑制速度快87.56%,是Buck-Boost变换器最适合的控制方法。此外,基于误差性能指标和动态行为的评估值,还证明了遗传算法是Buck-Boost变换器中PID整定的最佳优化技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biosensors for the Detection of Toxic Contaminants from Water Reservoirs Essential for Potable and Agriculture Needs: A Review High Performance Variable Precision Multiplier and Accumulator Unit for Digital Filter Applications PCA and SVM Technique for Epileptic Seizure Classification Design and Analysis of Self-write-terminated Hybrid STT-MTJ/CMOS Logic Gates using LIM Architecture Joint Trajectory Tracking of Two- link Flexible Manipulator in Presence of Matched Uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1