Good Vibrations: Tuning a Systems Dynamics Model of Affect and Cognition in Learning to the Appropriate Frequency Bands of Fine-Grained Temporal Sequences of Data: Frequency Bands of Affect and Cognition

J. Mercier, Kathleen Whissell-Turner, Ariane Paradis, I. Avaca
{"title":"Good Vibrations: Tuning a Systems Dynamics Model of Affect and Cognition in Learning to the Appropriate Frequency Bands of Fine-Grained Temporal Sequences of Data: Frequency Bands of Affect and Cognition","authors":"J. Mercier, Kathleen Whissell-Turner, Ariane Paradis, I. Avaca","doi":"10.1145/3439231.3440604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process-oriented studies of cooperative learning from an educational neuroscience perspective has not been firmly quantified experimentally. Within a modeling approach aimed at the development of a systems dynamics model of affect and cognition, the goal of this exploratory study is to identify typical timescales of variation for continuous metrics of affect (Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA): valence) and cognition (Cognitive Load (CL); Index of Cognitive Engagement (ICE); Frontal Midline Theta (FMT): attention). These metrics were obtained from 72 participants paired in dyads (player and watcher) from whom electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for 2 hours while one participant was playing a serious game to learn Physics, and the other one was watching passively. The results show rather slow cyclical variation for every metric tested, accompanied in certain cases by short bursts of faster variations. This result converges with [Newell 1990] cognitive architecture assuming that psychophysiological measures capture activity at higher levels such as operation tasks and operations. Theoretical, methodological and applied implications are discussed. Also, the need for further fine-grained analyses of the context and other atypical analyses are expressed.","PeriodicalId":210400,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3440604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Process-oriented studies of cooperative learning from an educational neuroscience perspective has not been firmly quantified experimentally. Within a modeling approach aimed at the development of a systems dynamics model of affect and cognition, the goal of this exploratory study is to identify typical timescales of variation for continuous metrics of affect (Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA): valence) and cognition (Cognitive Load (CL); Index of Cognitive Engagement (ICE); Frontal Midline Theta (FMT): attention). These metrics were obtained from 72 participants paired in dyads (player and watcher) from whom electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for 2 hours while one participant was playing a serious game to learn Physics, and the other one was watching passively. The results show rather slow cyclical variation for every metric tested, accompanied in certain cases by short bursts of faster variations. This result converges with [Newell 1990] cognitive architecture assuming that psychophysiological measures capture activity at higher levels such as operation tasks and operations. Theoretical, methodological and applied implications are discussed. Also, the need for further fine-grained analyses of the context and other atypical analyses are expressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良好的振动:调整学习中情感和认知的系统动力学模型到细粒度时间序列数据的适当频带:情感和认知的频带
从教育神经科学的角度对合作学习过程导向的研究还没有得到实验的量化。在旨在建立情感和认知系统动力学模型的建模方法中,本探索性研究的目标是确定情感(额叶α不对称(FAA):效价)和认知(认知负荷(CL);认知投入指数(ICE);额叶中线θ (FMT):注意。这些指标来自72名参与者(玩家和观察者),他们的脑电图(EEG)被记录了2小时,其中一名参与者正在玩一个严肃的游戏来学习物理,而另一名则是被动地观看。结果显示,每一个测试指标的周期性变化相当缓慢,在某些情况下伴随着快速变化的短爆发。这一结果与[Newell 1990]的认知架构相一致,该架构假设心理生理学测量可以捕捉更高层次的活动,如操作任务和操作。讨论了理论、方法和应用意义。此外,还表示需要对上下文进行进一步的细粒度分析和其他非典型分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can children of typical development benefit from inclusion intervention with Daisy Robot - a socially assistive robot? Pedagogical Triangulations: from the online forum to the e-magazine: a praxiological experience about school and its actor during COVID19 confinement CovidSense: A Smartphone-based Initiative for Fighting COVID-19 Spreading Apple Siri (input) + Voice Over (output) = a de facto marriage: An exploratory case study with blind people Is Simple English Wikipedia As Simple And Easy-to-Understand As We Expect It To Be?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1