Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between the Adequacy of Family Resources andPersonal, Family, and Child Well-Being

Carl J. Dunst
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between the Adequacy of Family Resources andPersonal, Family, and Child Well-Being","authors":"Carl J. Dunst","doi":"10.15640/jpbs.v9n1a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis includes evaluations of the relationships between the adequacy of family resources and seven dimensions of personal, family, and child well-being. Adequacy of family resources was expected to be related to enhanced positive well-being and attenuated negative well-being. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the Family Resource Scale was used to measure family resources, the total scale score was used to measure the adequacy of family resources, one or more personal, family, or child well-being measures was used to assess psychological functioning, and the correlations between the adequacy of family resources and well-being were reported. Forty-four research reports met the inclusion criteria and included 50 independent samples of study participants (N = 8,183). The studies were conducted in six different countries between 1986 and 2019. Results showed that adequacy of family resources was positively related to all seven personal, family, and child well-being measures. The findings provide support for the contention that the adequacy of family resources would be related to enhanced positive and attenuated negative well-being. The strength of the relationships between family resources and the different dimensions of well-being differed as a function of child risk condition but not the number of family resource scale items used to measure the adequacy of family resources. The results are consistent with the basic tenets of different family systems models. Both the strengths and limitations of the research synthesis are described.","PeriodicalId":220141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v9n1a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This meta-analysis includes evaluations of the relationships between the adequacy of family resources and seven dimensions of personal, family, and child well-being. Adequacy of family resources was expected to be related to enhanced positive well-being and attenuated negative well-being. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the Family Resource Scale was used to measure family resources, the total scale score was used to measure the adequacy of family resources, one or more personal, family, or child well-being measures was used to assess psychological functioning, and the correlations between the adequacy of family resources and well-being were reported. Forty-four research reports met the inclusion criteria and included 50 independent samples of study participants (N = 8,183). The studies were conducted in six different countries between 1986 and 2019. Results showed that adequacy of family resources was positively related to all seven personal, family, and child well-being measures. The findings provide support for the contention that the adequacy of family resources would be related to enhanced positive and attenuated negative well-being. The strength of the relationships between family resources and the different dimensions of well-being differed as a function of child risk condition but not the number of family resource scale items used to measure the adequacy of family resources. The results are consistent with the basic tenets of different family systems models. Both the strengths and limitations of the research synthesis are described.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭资源充足性与个人、家庭和儿童幸福感关系的元分析
本荟萃分析包括评估家庭资源充足性与个人、家庭和儿童福祉七个维度之间的关系。预期家庭资源的充分性与积极幸福的增强和消极幸福的减弱有关。如果使用家庭资源量表来衡量家庭资源,使用总量表得分来衡量家庭资源的充分性,使用一种或多种个人、家庭或儿童福利措施来评估心理功能,并且报告了家庭资源充分性与幸福感之间的相关性,则研究符合纳入条件。44份研究报告符合纳入标准,包括50个研究参与者的独立样本(N = 8,183)。这些研究于1986年至2019年在六个不同的国家进行。结果显示,家庭资源的充足性与所有七项个人、家庭和儿童福祉指标呈正相关。研究结果支持了家庭资源的充足性与积极幸福感的增强和消极幸福感的减弱有关的论点。家庭资源与幸福的不同维度之间的关系强度作为儿童风险条件的函数而有所不同,但用于衡量家庭资源充足性的家庭资源量表项目的数量没有变化。研究结果与不同家庭系统模型的基本原理一致。本文描述了研究综合的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superstitious Rituals Among College Athletes: A Pilot Study Adaptive Behaviours among Adolescent Students from Divorce Homes in various Religious Backgrounds in Ghana. Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between the Adequacy of Family Resources andPersonal, Family, and Child Well-Being Malingered Mutism: The Case of Mary Doherty Emotion has (No) Voice: Training -Emotions Relationship Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1