Tocilizumab Treatment for Hospitalized Patients with Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

A. Alsaeedi
{"title":"Tocilizumab Treatment for Hospitalized Patients with Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study","authors":"A. Alsaeedi","doi":"10.19080/IJOPRS.2021.04.555646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tocilizumab, through the blocking of interleukin-6 receptors, is hypothesized to be effective in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, data on tocilizumab use in this setting is conflicting. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tocilizumab treatment on the outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective case-control study including 168 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia at Al-Jahra hospital, Kuwait, from April 1st to June 30th. All patients received standard of care treatment. Patients in the tocilizumab group received tocilizumab infusion. The primary outcomes were death, need for mechanical ventilation and the proportion of patients with clinical improvement. The incidence of adverse events was monitored. Results: Need for mechanical ventilation was higher in the tocilizumab group (48% vs. 24.3%, p=0.002). Clinical improvement was lower (54.1% vs. 71.4%) and number of deaths were higher (29.6% vs. 10%) in the tocilizumab group (p=0.009). There was no difference in the mean survival time between tocilizumab and control group (17.7 days vs. 19.2 days). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of infections (6.1% vs. 2.9%, p=0.471). Conclusion: Our results suggest that use of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia does not provide clinical or mortality benefit. However, further research is needed to determine the ideal utilization of tocilizumab in the setting of severe COVID-19 disease.","PeriodicalId":257243,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/IJOPRS.2021.04.555646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tocilizumab, through the blocking of interleukin-6 receptors, is hypothesized to be effective in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, data on tocilizumab use in this setting is conflicting. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tocilizumab treatment on the outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective case-control study including 168 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia at Al-Jahra hospital, Kuwait, from April 1st to June 30th. All patients received standard of care treatment. Patients in the tocilizumab group received tocilizumab infusion. The primary outcomes were death, need for mechanical ventilation and the proportion of patients with clinical improvement. The incidence of adverse events was monitored. Results: Need for mechanical ventilation was higher in the tocilizumab group (48% vs. 24.3%, p=0.002). Clinical improvement was lower (54.1% vs. 71.4%) and number of deaths were higher (29.6% vs. 10%) in the tocilizumab group (p=0.009). There was no difference in the mean survival time between tocilizumab and control group (17.7 days vs. 19.2 days). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of infections (6.1% vs. 2.9%, p=0.471). Conclusion: Our results suggest that use of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia does not provide clinical or mortality benefit. However, further research is needed to determine the ideal utilization of tocilizumab in the setting of severe COVID-19 disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托珠单抗治疗重症Covid-19肺炎住院患者:回顾性病例-对照研究
背景:托珠单抗通过阻断白细胞介素-6受体,被推测可有效治疗2019年严重冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。然而,托珠单抗在这种情况下的使用数据是相互矛盾的。目的:评价托珠单抗治疗对重症COVID-19肺炎患者预后的影响。方法:对4月1日至6月30日在科威特Al-Jahra医院收治的168例重症COVID-19肺炎患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。所有患者均接受标准护理治疗。托珠单抗组患者接受托珠单抗输注。主要结局为死亡、机械通气需求和临床改善患者比例。监测不良事件的发生率。结果:托珠单抗组机械通气需求较高(48% vs. 24.3%, p=0.002)。托珠单抗组的临床改善较低(54.1%对71.4%),死亡人数较高(29.6%对10%)(p=0.009)。托珠单抗组和对照组的平均生存时间没有差异(17.7天对19.2天)。两组感染发生率无显著差异(6.1% vs. 2.9%, p=0.471)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在重症COVID-19肺炎中使用托珠单抗并没有提供临床或死亡率方面的益处。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定托珠单抗在严重COVID-19疾病背景下的理想应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in A Young Patient with Strong Family Background Intermittent Silent Coronary Spasm with Variant Premature Ventricular Contractions, and QRS-Complex Fragmentation in COVID-19 Pneumonia with Stroke and Pleural Effusion; Serious Risk but a Good Outcome A Rare Case of Trapped Lung Cause by Chronic Pleural Effusion: Another Etiology of This Uncommon Disease Bullous Lung Disease in Young IV Drug Abuser: A Case Report Comparison of Specific Inhalation Challenge Test Results in Occupational and Non- Occupational Asthma Patients: Is Monitoring Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Sufficient for Diagnosis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1