{"title":"10. Cohesion Policy","authors":"J. Bachtler, Carlos Mendez","doi":"10.1093/hepl/9780198807605.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Union cohesion policy accounts for a major share of the EU budget and aims to reduce economic, social, and territorial disparities through investment programmes and projects aligned with EU strategic objectives and implemented under a unique model of multi-level governance. This chapter reviews the evolution of cohesion policy over successive reform phases, how the policy is implemented, and the evidence for its effectiveness. It also discusses the different policy modes encompassed in the policy, and it reviews recent political developments relating to politicization, Brexit, the sectoralization of EU spending, and the implications of the Covid-19 pandemic. The chapter concludes that the resourcing, priorities, and governance of cohesion policy for 2021–27 represent a new turning point in the prospects for the policy, following the strategic turns of 2006 and 2013 (Bachtler et al. 2013). While the budget for cohesion policy remains substantial, the policy’s importance is diminishing as a result of greater centralization of political decision-making within the Commission, a fragmentation of the political constituencies for cohesion policy, and the dominance of non-spatial EU policy priorities with centralized delivery mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":433174,"journal":{"name":"Policy-Making in the European Union","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy-Making in the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198807605.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
European Union cohesion policy accounts for a major share of the EU budget and aims to reduce economic, social, and territorial disparities through investment programmes and projects aligned with EU strategic objectives and implemented under a unique model of multi-level governance. This chapter reviews the evolution of cohesion policy over successive reform phases, how the policy is implemented, and the evidence for its effectiveness. It also discusses the different policy modes encompassed in the policy, and it reviews recent political developments relating to politicization, Brexit, the sectoralization of EU spending, and the implications of the Covid-19 pandemic. The chapter concludes that the resourcing, priorities, and governance of cohesion policy for 2021–27 represent a new turning point in the prospects for the policy, following the strategic turns of 2006 and 2013 (Bachtler et al. 2013). While the budget for cohesion policy remains substantial, the policy’s importance is diminishing as a result of greater centralization of political decision-making within the Commission, a fragmentation of the political constituencies for cohesion policy, and the dominance of non-spatial EU policy priorities with centralized delivery mechanisms.
欧盟凝聚力政策占欧盟预算的主要份额,旨在通过与欧盟战略目标一致的投资计划和项目,并在独特的多层次治理模式下实施,减少经济、社会和领土差异。本章回顾了凝聚力政策在连续改革阶段的演变,政策是如何实施的,以及其有效性的证据。报告还讨论了政策中包含的不同政策模式,并回顾了最近与政治化、英国脱欧、欧盟支出的部门化以及新冠肺炎大流行的影响有关的政治发展。本章的结论是,继2006年和2013年的战略转折之后,2021-27年凝聚力政策的资源配置、优先事项和治理代表了政策前景的新转折点(Bachtler et al. 2013)。虽然凝聚力政策的预算仍然很大,但由于欧盟委员会内部政治决策更加集中,凝聚力政策的政治选区分散,以及非空间欧盟政策优先事项在集中实施机制中的主导地位,政策的重要性正在减弱。