Latino Undergraduate Perspectives on Traditional and Collaborative Culminating Presentations

Bobbette M. Morgan, Kathy Bussert-Webb, Hannah M. Masso
{"title":"Latino Undergraduate Perspectives on Traditional and Collaborative Culminating Presentations","authors":"Bobbette M. Morgan, Kathy Bussert-Webb, Hannah M. Masso","doi":"10.2478/RPP-2018-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The importance of the research related to the existence of collaborative learning in higher education for Latinos, specifically pre-service teachers, has been substantiated. It has been defined that while teacher retention rates for Latinos are lower than for whites, using teamwork in the classroom might make Latinos teaching more rewarding. Most participants in the present study preferred collaborative learning as teachers. Using cognitive- and social-constructivist frameworks, the authors provide trends expressed by 371 undergraduate pre-service teachers about traditional tests and cooperative culminating experiences. Since archival data from regular collaborative pedagogies over a 10-year period have been used, the authors did not include identifying information. However, about 96 % of undergraduates are first-generation Latino/college students. Students’ responses to end-of-course surveys have been analyzed. The two major qualitative themes emerging from grounded theory analysis were social interaction and the cognitive domain. Quantitatively, most preferred group presentations over traditional exams. Statistically significant correlations between Variables 1 (perceived retention of material) and 2 (preferred culminating experience as future teachers), Variables 1 (perceived retention of material) and 3 (culminating experience for an easy A), and Variables 2 (preferred culminating experience as future teachers) and 3 (culminating experience for an easy A) have been found. Implications relate to designing more collaborative activities for nondominant college students. As the result of the conducted research it has been determined that collaborative learning needs to be well planned, students need to be prepared to work in groups, and teachers’ expectations need to be stated explicitly if the benefits attributed to collaborative learning are to be realized.","PeriodicalId":113315,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Professional Pedagogy","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Professional Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/RPP-2018-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The importance of the research related to the existence of collaborative learning in higher education for Latinos, specifically pre-service teachers, has been substantiated. It has been defined that while teacher retention rates for Latinos are lower than for whites, using teamwork in the classroom might make Latinos teaching more rewarding. Most participants in the present study preferred collaborative learning as teachers. Using cognitive- and social-constructivist frameworks, the authors provide trends expressed by 371 undergraduate pre-service teachers about traditional tests and cooperative culminating experiences. Since archival data from regular collaborative pedagogies over a 10-year period have been used, the authors did not include identifying information. However, about 96 % of undergraduates are first-generation Latino/college students. Students’ responses to end-of-course surveys have been analyzed. The two major qualitative themes emerging from grounded theory analysis were social interaction and the cognitive domain. Quantitatively, most preferred group presentations over traditional exams. Statistically significant correlations between Variables 1 (perceived retention of material) and 2 (preferred culminating experience as future teachers), Variables 1 (perceived retention of material) and 3 (culminating experience for an easy A), and Variables 2 (preferred culminating experience as future teachers) and 3 (culminating experience for an easy A) have been found. Implications relate to designing more collaborative activities for nondominant college students. As the result of the conducted research it has been determined that collaborative learning needs to be well planned, students need to be prepared to work in groups, and teachers’ expectations need to be stated explicitly if the benefits attributed to collaborative learning are to be realized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁裔大学生对传统和合作高潮演讲的看法
研究拉丁裔,特别是职前教师在高等教育中存在协作学习的重要性已经得到证实。虽然拉美裔教师的留任率低于白人教师,但在课堂上使用团队合作可能会使拉美裔教师的教学更有回报。在本研究中,大多数被试倾向于作为教师进行协作学习。利用认知和社会建构主义框架,作者提供了371名本科职前教师关于传统测试和合作高潮体验的趋势。由于使用的是10年来常规合作教学的档案数据,因此作者没有包括识别信息。然而,大约96%的本科生是第一代拉丁裔/大学生。分析了学生对课程结束调查的反应。从扎根理论分析中出现的两个主要定性主题是社会互动和认知领域。在数量上,大多数人更喜欢小组演示而不是传统的考试。变量1(材料的感知保留)和2(作为未来教师的首选最终经验),变量1(材料的感知保留)和3(简单A的最终经验),变量2(作为未来教师的首选最终经验)和3(简单A的最终经验)之间的统计显著相关性已经被发现。这与为非优势大学生设计更多的合作活动有关。根据所进行的研究,如果要实现协作学习的好处,协作学习需要有良好的计划,学生需要为小组工作做好准备,教师的期望需要明确说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CREATING A MOTIVATIONAL CONTEXT FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING OF STUDENTS AT HUMANITARIAN COLLEGES IN EASTERN EUROPE ШВЕДСЬКИЙ ДОСВІД ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ ПІДГОТОВКИ ВЧИТЕЛІВ В КОНТЕКСТІ ОСВІТНІХ РЕФОРМ В УКРАЇНІ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТУВАННЯ ЯК ВИДУ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ДІТЕЙ ДОШКІЛЬНОГО ВІКУ: ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИЙ ДОСВІД РОЗВИТОК МЕДІАКОМПЕТЕНТНОСТІ ЗДОБУВАЧІВ ДОШКІЛЬНОЇ ОСВІТИ: ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИЙ ДОСВІД ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ ПІДГОТОВКИ ФАРМАЦЕВТІВ В УНІВЕРСИТЕТАХ ВЕЛИКОЇ БРИТАНІЇ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1