Assessing student learning: it can be more than a survey

William K. Dalton
{"title":"Assessing student learning: it can be more than a survey","authors":"William K. Dalton","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a trend toward the assessment of more \"outputs\" rather than \"inputs\" in the accreditation processes. The immediate need was to develop an assessment plan to meet the requirements of the North Central Association for future accreditation of the university. Subsequently the desired outputs, student learning outcomes or academic achievements, were defined as what a student can do with their learning. Deciding what constituted these outcomes or achievements was the next step since these were the factors that would be assessed. Many of these factors are subjective in nature and surveys seemed an effective and efficient way to do the assessment. However, the author believes that assessment of student learning outcomes or achievements should begin with instructors taking a reflective look at, i.e., assess, how their students are doing. This process should involve analysis of more than just the exam results. The author has been guided in this process by a course development model he uses which is a modification of models previously published. The steps of this model are explained and his use of it to assess student learning explored. Data which he has collected on his students is discussed. The role this assessment process has played in revisions made to the metallurgy course he teaches are also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a trend toward the assessment of more "outputs" rather than "inputs" in the accreditation processes. The immediate need was to develop an assessment plan to meet the requirements of the North Central Association for future accreditation of the university. Subsequently the desired outputs, student learning outcomes or academic achievements, were defined as what a student can do with their learning. Deciding what constituted these outcomes or achievements was the next step since these were the factors that would be assessed. Many of these factors are subjective in nature and surveys seemed an effective and efficient way to do the assessment. However, the author believes that assessment of student learning outcomes or achievements should begin with instructors taking a reflective look at, i.e., assess, how their students are doing. This process should involve analysis of more than just the exam results. The author has been guided in this process by a course development model he uses which is a modification of models previously published. The steps of this model are explained and his use of it to assess student learning explored. Data which he has collected on his students is discussed. The role this assessment process has played in revisions made to the metallurgy course he teaches are also be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估学生的学习:这不仅仅是一个调查
在认可过程中,有一种倾向是评价更多的“产出”而不是“投入”。当务之急是制定一项评估计划,以满足北中协会对该大学未来认证的要求。随后,期望的产出,即学生的学习成果或学术成就,被定义为学生通过学习可以做些什么。决定什么构成了这些结果或成就是下一步,因为这些是将要评估的因素。这些因素中的许多都是主观的,调查似乎是进行评估的有效和高效的方法。然而,作者认为,对学生学习成果或成就的评估应该从教师反思开始,即评估学生的表现。这个过程应该包括分析不仅仅是考试结果。作者在这个过程中受到他使用的课程开发模型的指导,该模型是对先前发表的模型的修改。他解释了这个模型的步骤,并探讨了他如何使用这个模型来评估学生的学习。讨论了他收集的关于学生的资料。本文还讨论了这一评估过程在他所教授的冶金学课程的修订中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students Toward a pre-disciplinary introductory design sequence People, product and process: interactive multimedia case study in integrated design and manufacturing strategies Systems model for learning A faculty-driven quality initiative at the Colorado School of Mines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1