The need for an integrated theoretical framework for researching the influence of group diversity on performance

John Qin, Bernard O'Meara, S. McEachern
{"title":"The need for an integrated theoretical framework for researching the influence of group diversity on performance","authors":"John Qin, Bernard O'Meara, S. McEachern","doi":"10.1108/01409170910977951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Investigating diversity presents researchers with a paradox because extremely inconsistent and conflicting findings about the effects of diversity have emerged in this field of study. It has been argued that the theoretical frameworks used have contributed to the paradox. Different and contradictory effects concerning the influence of group diversity can be predicted using these frameworks. The purpose of this paper is to examine the application of the main theoretical frameworks in the context of researching diversity.Design/methodology/approach – The focus of this paper is a critical examination of three theoretical frameworks in the field of diversity research – similarity‐attraction theory, social categorization theory and the information/decision‐making approach. These are commonly applied in researching diversity. The basic elements of each theory, its applications in diversity research and its strengths and limitations are considered.Findings – The discussion suggests that the paradox in ...","PeriodicalId":325346,"journal":{"name":"Management Research News","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910977951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose – Investigating diversity presents researchers with a paradox because extremely inconsistent and conflicting findings about the effects of diversity have emerged in this field of study. It has been argued that the theoretical frameworks used have contributed to the paradox. Different and contradictory effects concerning the influence of group diversity can be predicted using these frameworks. The purpose of this paper is to examine the application of the main theoretical frameworks in the context of researching diversity.Design/methodology/approach – The focus of this paper is a critical examination of three theoretical frameworks in the field of diversity research – similarity‐attraction theory, social categorization theory and the information/decision‐making approach. These are commonly applied in researching diversity. The basic elements of each theory, its applications in diversity research and its strengths and limitations are considered.Findings – The discussion suggests that the paradox in ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究群体多样性对绩效的影响需要一个完整的理论框架
目的-研究多样性给研究人员带来了一个悖论,因为在这个研究领域中出现了关于多样性影响的极不一致和相互矛盾的发现。有人认为,所使用的理论框架促成了这一悖论。使用这些框架可以预测群体多样性影响的不同和矛盾效应。本文的目的是考察主要理论框架在研究多样性背景下的应用。设计/方法论/方法-本文的重点是对多样性研究领域的三个理论框架——相似性-吸引力理论、社会分类理论和信息/决策方法进行批判性检查。这些通常用于研究多样性。讨论了每种理论的基本要素、在多样性研究中的应用及其优缺点。发现——讨论表明……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of Professionalism as an Issue in British Marketing The Quality of Working Life, Robotics and the Professional Engineer Escalation of Commitment in Groups and the Moderating Effects of Information Framing An exploratory RFID patent analysis Extending the intellectual bandwidth model: a case study from the bioscience industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1