Image Forgery Detection using Machine Learning with Fusion of Global and Local Thepade's SBTC Features

Sudeep D. Thepade, Sanket Bhandari, C. Bagde, Rutuja Chaware, Krutik Lodha
{"title":"Image Forgery Detection using Machine Learning with Fusion of Global and Local Thepade's SBTC Features","authors":"Sudeep D. Thepade, Sanket Bhandari, C. Bagde, Rutuja Chaware, Krutik Lodha","doi":"10.1109/CENTCON52345.2021.9688094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image forgery is manipulating digital images to hide or change some useful information contained in the images. Images are considered the most effective way to convey information, and manipulating this information sometimes creates havoc. The action of tampering with images that are done either for fun or to give false evidence has resulted in a disaster in some cases. It is done in such a way that it cannot be determined by the naked human eye, so many people have implemented various types of machine learning algorithms, which they have implemented with handcrafted features to determine different types of forgery and whether an image is forged or not. These algorithms are used to extract the digital signature differentiating whether an image has been tampered with or not. Various techniques have been implemented for either fine or coarse image splicing, whereas a technique dealing with both needs to be devised. For this, our proposed work focuses on different types of machine learning classifiers and 10-fold classification. The attempted values of n for the machine learning classifier include 2,3,4. The different types of classifiers include Random Forest, Random tree, support vector machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes. These classifier models are trained on comofod, casia v2.0 datasets. Accuracy increase is observed when a fusion of Thepade's Sorted Block Truncation Coding (i.e., Thepade's SBTC) local and Thepade's SBTC global feature tables.","PeriodicalId":103865,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies for Multi-Disciplinary Research and Applications (CENTCON)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies for Multi-Disciplinary Research and Applications (CENTCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CENTCON52345.2021.9688094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Image forgery is manipulating digital images to hide or change some useful information contained in the images. Images are considered the most effective way to convey information, and manipulating this information sometimes creates havoc. The action of tampering with images that are done either for fun or to give false evidence has resulted in a disaster in some cases. It is done in such a way that it cannot be determined by the naked human eye, so many people have implemented various types of machine learning algorithms, which they have implemented with handcrafted features to determine different types of forgery and whether an image is forged or not. These algorithms are used to extract the digital signature differentiating whether an image has been tampered with or not. Various techniques have been implemented for either fine or coarse image splicing, whereas a technique dealing with both needs to be devised. For this, our proposed work focuses on different types of machine learning classifiers and 10-fold classification. The attempted values of n for the machine learning classifier include 2,3,4. The different types of classifiers include Random Forest, Random tree, support vector machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes. These classifier models are trained on comofod, casia v2.0 datasets. Accuracy increase is observed when a fusion of Thepade's Sorted Block Truncation Coding (i.e., Thepade's SBTC) local and Thepade's SBTC global feature tables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于全局与局部特征融合的机器学习图像伪造检测
图像伪造是对数字图像进行操纵,以隐藏或改变图像中包含的一些有用信息。图像被认为是传达信息最有效的方式,操纵这些信息有时会造成混乱。在某些情况下,为了好玩或提供虚假证据而篡改图像的行为导致了灾难。它是以一种肉眼无法确定的方式完成的,所以很多人已经实现了各种类型的机器学习算法,他们已经实现了手工制作的功能,以确定不同类型的伪造以及图像是否伪造。这些算法用于提取区分图像是否被篡改的数字签名。对于精细或粗糙的图像拼接,已经实现了各种各样的技术,但是需要设计一种处理两者的技术。为此,我们提出的工作重点是不同类型的机器学习分类器和10倍分类。机器学习分类器尝试的n值包括2,3,4。不同类型的分类器包括随机森林、随机树、支持向量机、逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯。这些分类器模型是在comofood, casia v2.0数据集上训练的。当thepage的排序块截断编码(即thepage的SBTC)局部和thepage的SBTC全局特征表融合时,可以观察到准确性的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Open Defect Faults in Single 6T SRAM Cell Using R and C Parasitic Extraction Method Python Data Analytics of Influence on Temperature and Humidity of City from Mountains: Case Study of Chengdu Qingcheng Mountains Determinant Effects of using Toilet Cleaners on Indoor Air Quality Hate Speech Detection using Text and Image Tweets Based On Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory Improving Cloud Security and Privacy Using Blockchain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1