Student Progression through Developmental Sequences in Community Colleges. CCRC Brief. Number 45.

T. Bailey, Dongwook Jeong, Sung-woo Cho
{"title":"Student Progression through Developmental Sequences in Community Colleges. CCRC Brief. Number 45.","authors":"T. Bailey, Dongwook Jeong, Sung-woo Cho","doi":"10.7916/D8QZ2KBG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental education is designed to provide students with weak academic skills the opportunity to strengthen those skills enough to prepare them for college-level coursework. The concept is simple enough—students who arrive unprepared for college are provided instruction to bring them up to an adequate level. But in practice, developmental education (or “remedial” education, we use these terms interchangeably) is complex and confusing. Experts do not agree on the meaning of being “college ready,” and policies governing assessment, placement, pedagogy, staffing, completion, and eligibility for enrollment in college-level, credit-bearing courses vary from state to state, college to college, and program to program. The developmental education process is confusing enough simply to describe, yet from the point of view of the student, especially one with very weak academic skills and little previous success in school, it may appear as a bewildering set of unanticipated obstacles involving several assessments, classes in more than one subject area, and sequences of courses requiring three or more semesters of study before the student (often a high school graduate) is judged prepared for college-level work. The policy deliberation and especially the research about developmental education give scant attention to this confusion and complexity. Discussion typically assumes that the state of being “college ready” is well-defined, and it often elides the distinction between students who need remediation and those who actually enroll in developmental courses. What is more, developmental education is often discussed without acknowledgement of the extensive diversity of services that bear that label. Any comprehensive understanding of developmental education and any successful strategy to improve its effectiveness cannot be built on such a simplistic view. In this Brief, which summarizes a study by the Community College Research Center on patterns of student progression through developmental education, we broaden the discussion by moving beyond consideration of the developmental course and focus attention instead on the developmental sequence. In most colleges, students are, upon initial enrollment, assigned to different levels of developmental education on the basis of performance on placement tests. Students with greater academic deficiencies are often referred to a sequence of three or more courses designed to prepare them in a stepby-step fashion for the first college-level course in a particular subject area. For example, students with the greatest need in developmental math may be expected to enroll in and pass pre-collegiate math or arithmetic, basic algebra, and intermediate algebra in order to prepare them for college-level algebra. We define the “sequence” as a process that begins with initial assessment and referral to remediation and ends with completion of the highestlevel developmental course—the course that in principle completes the student’s preparation for college-level studies. At times we extend the notion of “sequence” into the first-level college course in the relevant subject area—known as the “gatekeeper” course—since in the end the short-term purpose of remediation is to prepare the student to be successful in that first college-level course. In this study we examine the relationship between referral to developmental education and actual enrollment, and we track students as they progress or fail to progress through their referred sequences of remedial courses, analyzing the points at which they exit those sequences. We also analyze demographic and institutional characteristics that may be related to student progression in developmental sequences. We carry out this analysis using longitudinal data collected as part of the Achieving the Dream: Community Colleges Count initiative (see www.achievingthedream.org). The sample includes data on more than 250,000 students from 57 colleges in seven states. This Achieving the Dream sample more closely represents an urban, low-income, and minority student population than do community colleges in the country as a whole. Because the sample is not representative of all community college students, we checked our results—when possible—","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8QZ2KBG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Developmental education is designed to provide students with weak academic skills the opportunity to strengthen those skills enough to prepare them for college-level coursework. The concept is simple enough—students who arrive unprepared for college are provided instruction to bring them up to an adequate level. But in practice, developmental education (or “remedial” education, we use these terms interchangeably) is complex and confusing. Experts do not agree on the meaning of being “college ready,” and policies governing assessment, placement, pedagogy, staffing, completion, and eligibility for enrollment in college-level, credit-bearing courses vary from state to state, college to college, and program to program. The developmental education process is confusing enough simply to describe, yet from the point of view of the student, especially one with very weak academic skills and little previous success in school, it may appear as a bewildering set of unanticipated obstacles involving several assessments, classes in more than one subject area, and sequences of courses requiring three or more semesters of study before the student (often a high school graduate) is judged prepared for college-level work. The policy deliberation and especially the research about developmental education give scant attention to this confusion and complexity. Discussion typically assumes that the state of being “college ready” is well-defined, and it often elides the distinction between students who need remediation and those who actually enroll in developmental courses. What is more, developmental education is often discussed without acknowledgement of the extensive diversity of services that bear that label. Any comprehensive understanding of developmental education and any successful strategy to improve its effectiveness cannot be built on such a simplistic view. In this Brief, which summarizes a study by the Community College Research Center on patterns of student progression through developmental education, we broaden the discussion by moving beyond consideration of the developmental course and focus attention instead on the developmental sequence. In most colleges, students are, upon initial enrollment, assigned to different levels of developmental education on the basis of performance on placement tests. Students with greater academic deficiencies are often referred to a sequence of three or more courses designed to prepare them in a stepby-step fashion for the first college-level course in a particular subject area. For example, students with the greatest need in developmental math may be expected to enroll in and pass pre-collegiate math or arithmetic, basic algebra, and intermediate algebra in order to prepare them for college-level algebra. We define the “sequence” as a process that begins with initial assessment and referral to remediation and ends with completion of the highestlevel developmental course—the course that in principle completes the student’s preparation for college-level studies. At times we extend the notion of “sequence” into the first-level college course in the relevant subject area—known as the “gatekeeper” course—since in the end the short-term purpose of remediation is to prepare the student to be successful in that first college-level course. In this study we examine the relationship between referral to developmental education and actual enrollment, and we track students as they progress or fail to progress through their referred sequences of remedial courses, analyzing the points at which they exit those sequences. We also analyze demographic and institutional characteristics that may be related to student progression in developmental sequences. We carry out this analysis using longitudinal data collected as part of the Achieving the Dream: Community Colleges Count initiative (see www.achievingthedream.org). The sample includes data on more than 250,000 students from 57 colleges in seven states. This Achieving the Dream sample more closely represents an urban, low-income, and minority student population than do community colleges in the country as a whole. Because the sample is not representative of all community college students, we checked our results—when possible—
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社区大学发展顺序的学生进步。CCRC简短。45号。
发展性教育旨在为学术技能较弱的学生提供机会,以加强这些技能,使他们为大学水平的课程做好准备。这个概念很简单——为那些没有准备上大学的学生提供指导,使他们达到适当的水平。但在实践中,发展教育(或“补救”教育,我们可以互换使用这些术语)是复杂而令人困惑的。专家们对“准备好上大学”的含义并不一致,管理评估、安置、教学方法、人员配置、完成和大学水平入学资格的政策、学分课程因州而异、因学院而异、因项目而异。发展教育的过程简单地描述起来就已经足够令人困惑了,然而从学生的角度来看,尤其是从那些学习能力很弱、以前在学校里几乎没有成功的学生的角度来看,它可能会出现一系列令人困惑的意想不到的障碍,包括几个评估,多个学科领域的课程,以及在学生(通常是高中毕业生)被判定为准备好大学水平的工作之前需要三个或更多学期的课程序列。政策审议,特别是关于发展性教育的研究,对这种混乱和复杂性的关注不足。讨论通常假设“准备好上大学”的状态是明确定义的,并且它经常忽略了需要补习的学生和实际参加发展课程的学生之间的区别。更重要的是,在讨论发展性教育时往往不承认贴有这一标签的各种服务的广泛多样性。任何对发展性教育的全面理解和任何提高其有效性的成功战略都不能建立在这种简单化的观点之上。在这篇摘要中,我们总结了社区大学研究中心通过发展性教育对学生进步模式的研究,通过超越对发展过程的考虑而将注意力集中在发展顺序上,从而扩大了讨论范围。在大多数大学,学生一入学就根据分班考试的成绩被分配到不同层次的发展教育。学业较差的学生通常要参加三门或更多的课程,这些课程旨在为他们在某一特定学科领域的第一门大学水平课程做准备。例如,最需要发展数学的学生可能会被期望注册并通过大学预科数学或算术,基础代数和中级代数,以便为大学水平的代数做准备。我们将“顺序”定义为一个过程,从最初的评估和推荐到补救,到完成最高水平的发展课程——这个课程原则上完成了学生大学水平学习的准备。有时,我们把“顺序”的概念扩展到相关学科领域的一级大学课程中——被称为“看门人”课程——因为最终,补习的短期目的是为学生在第一门大学课程中取得成功做好准备。在本研究中,我们考察了转介到发展教育和实际入学之间的关系,并通过转介的补习课程序列跟踪学生的进步或失败,分析他们退出这些序列的点。我们还分析了可能与学生发展顺序相关的人口统计学和制度特征。我们使用作为“实现梦想:社区大学统计计划”(见www.achievingthedream.org)的一部分收集的纵向数据进行分析。样本包括来自7个州57所大学的25万多名学生的数据。这个实现梦想的样本比整个国家的社区大学更能代表城市、低收入和少数民族的学生群体。因为样本不能代表所有的社区大学生,所以我们尽可能地检查了结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redefining Full-Time in College: Evidence on 15-Credit Strategies A Growing Culture of Evidence? Findings From a Survey on Data Use at Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State Characterizing the Effectiveness of Developmental Education: A Response to Recent Criticism Acceleration Through a Holistic Support Model: An Implementation and Outcomes Analysis of FastStart@CCD Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1