Knowledge and Attitude of Rafsanjan’s Nursing Personnel Regarding Standard Precautions

M. Asadpour, Fazlollah Ghofranipour, H. Ardebil, S. Niknami, E. Hajizadeh, G. Hassanshahi
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitude of Rafsanjan’s Nursing Personnel Regarding Standard Precautions","authors":"M. Asadpour, Fazlollah Ghofranipour, H. Ardebil, S. Niknami, E. Hajizadeh, G. Hassanshahi","doi":"10.15412/J.JBTW.01040403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Health care workers (HCWs) and nursing personnel are at risk for occupational infection and exposure to a wide-ranging of virus-related infection. Standard precautions (SPs) are required for reducing the risk of blood-borne transmission and other pathogens in hospitals. Therefore present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and attitude of Rafsanjan’s nursing personnel about SPs. Current cross-sectional study was conducted on all nursing personnel in the study. A questionnaire was designed to measure the knowledge and attitude of nursing personnel regarding standard precautions. After determine the validity and Reliability of the questionnaire, an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire was distributed among nursing personnel. Afterwards the obtained data was inserted into the SPSS software (version16) then analyzed with t-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. The significance level for all tests was 0.05. Results of present study showed that 94.1% of samples were vaccinated against HBV, but the majority of them did not follow checking programs for anti-HBs, HBs Ag, Anti HBV, Anti HBC and Anti HIV. Of samples 45.2% reported that had at least one time needle stick injuries in their lifetime, while only 20.10 %( 44/219) reported an injury during the last year. The results showed that the mean and standard deviation of the knowledge and attitude score of nursing personnel regarding standard precautions were 22.9±3.21 and 43.88±5.3, respectively. The relationships between knowledge, attitude and demographic variables were not significant. The relationship between knowledge and attitude was a direct correlation. The knowledge score was not desirable whereas attitudes score was better and it could possibly be suggested that educational programs concerning various aspects of Standard precautions should be implemented.\"","PeriodicalId":119340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biology and Today`s World","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biology and Today`s World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JBTW.01040403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

"Health care workers (HCWs) and nursing personnel are at risk for occupational infection and exposure to a wide-ranging of virus-related infection. Standard precautions (SPs) are required for reducing the risk of blood-borne transmission and other pathogens in hospitals. Therefore present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and attitude of Rafsanjan’s nursing personnel about SPs. Current cross-sectional study was conducted on all nursing personnel in the study. A questionnaire was designed to measure the knowledge and attitude of nursing personnel regarding standard precautions. After determine the validity and Reliability of the questionnaire, an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire was distributed among nursing personnel. Afterwards the obtained data was inserted into the SPSS software (version16) then analyzed with t-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. The significance level for all tests was 0.05. Results of present study showed that 94.1% of samples were vaccinated against HBV, but the majority of them did not follow checking programs for anti-HBs, HBs Ag, Anti HBV, Anti HBC and Anti HIV. Of samples 45.2% reported that had at least one time needle stick injuries in their lifetime, while only 20.10 %( 44/219) reported an injury during the last year. The results showed that the mean and standard deviation of the knowledge and attitude score of nursing personnel regarding standard precautions were 22.9±3.21 and 43.88±5.3, respectively. The relationships between knowledge, attitude and demographic variables were not significant. The relationship between knowledge and attitude was a direct correlation. The knowledge score was not desirable whereas attitudes score was better and it could possibly be suggested that educational programs concerning various aspects of Standard precautions should be implemented."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉夫桑詹护理人员对标准预防措施的知识和态度
“卫生保健工作者和护理人员面临职业感染和接触广泛病毒相关感染的风险。标准预防措施(SPs)是降低医院血液传播和其他病原体风险的必要措施。因此,本研究旨在评估拉夫桑詹护理人员对SPs的知识水平和态度。目前的横断面研究是对所有参与研究的护理人员进行的。设计问卷调查护理人员对标准预防措施的知识和态度。在确定问卷的效度和信度后,在护理人员中发放一份匿名自填问卷。然后将所得数据插入SPSS软件(version16),采用t检验、方差分析、Mann-Whitney、Kruskal-Wallis和Spearman相关系数检验进行分析。所有检验的显著性水平均为0.05。本研究结果显示,94.1%的样本接种了HBV疫苗,但大多数样本未按照Anti -HBs、HBs Ag、Anti - HBV、Anti - HBC和Anti - HIV检测程序进行检测。45.2%的样本报告在其一生中至少有一次针头刺伤,而只有20.10%(44/219)的样本报告在过去一年中受伤。结果显示,护理人员对标准预防措施的知识态度得分均值为22.9±3.21分,标准差为43.88±5.3分。知识、态度与人口学变量之间的关系不显著。知识与态度之间呈直接相关关系。知识得分不理想,而态度得分较好,可能建议实施有关标准预防措施各方面的教育计划。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suspected Cardiovascular Side Effects of two Covid-19 Vaccines Investigation of Blood Selenium and Zinc in Type2 Diabetes with TCF7L2 (rs7903146 C/T) Genotypes Maternal and Perinatal Outcome, a Case Report of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Following Snakebite after Treatment with Polyvalent Anti-snake Bites A Review of Bio Inspired Computing and its Applications Survey of Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities of Gracilaria corticata (a Red Seaweed), Against RKO, AGS and HepG2 Human Cancer Cell Lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1