Electric Shock Hazards Beyond 50/60 HZ and DC

L. B. Gordon, Jesse Liechty, J. Bradley, L. Merrill, Henry Gauss
{"title":"Electric Shock Hazards Beyond 50/60 HZ and DC","authors":"L. B. Gordon, Jesse Liechty, J. Bradley, L. Merrill, Henry Gauss","doi":"10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of shock from alternating current (ac) power frequencies (50 and 60 Hz) and from direct. current (dc) has been studied for a century and thresholds for safety are now clearly defined in worker safety standards (i.e., NFPA 70E). However, shock thresholds for other frequencies and waveforms are not clearly stated in U.S. worker electrical safety standards. This includes frequencies of sub-radio frequency (RF) (1 Hz to 3 kHz) other than 50/60 Hz, RF (3 kHz to 100 MHz) and mixed waveforms, such as modulated dc. Of particular interest are 400 Hz, dc with significant ac ripple, and modulated RF. These waveforms are found in many commercial, industrial, and research applications, such as dc outputs of battery chargers, welders, etc., that may have a substantial 60 Hz ripple; modulated outputs of variable frequency drives for motors; inverters; and more. This paper presents what is known about such waveforms, from shock studies, international standards, and from accidents. Material reviewed includes existing standards (such as the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) shock standards), studies on shock effects, and a review of several accidents. Fourier analysis of mixed frequency waveforms will be presented which shows the primary frequency components which will determine response by the nerves, muscles and heart. A focus will be placed on the thresholds for injury for dc created by rectification, with remnant 60-Hz ripple.","PeriodicalId":325388,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The effects of shock from alternating current (ac) power frequencies (50 and 60 Hz) and from direct. current (dc) has been studied for a century and thresholds for safety are now clearly defined in worker safety standards (i.e., NFPA 70E). However, shock thresholds for other frequencies and waveforms are not clearly stated in U.S. worker electrical safety standards. This includes frequencies of sub-radio frequency (RF) (1 Hz to 3 kHz) other than 50/60 Hz, RF (3 kHz to 100 MHz) and mixed waveforms, such as modulated dc. Of particular interest are 400 Hz, dc with significant ac ripple, and modulated RF. These waveforms are found in many commercial, industrial, and research applications, such as dc outputs of battery chargers, welders, etc., that may have a substantial 60 Hz ripple; modulated outputs of variable frequency drives for motors; inverters; and more. This paper presents what is known about such waveforms, from shock studies, international standards, and from accidents. Material reviewed includes existing standards (such as the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) shock standards), studies on shock effects, and a review of several accidents. Fourier analysis of mixed frequency waveforms will be presented which shows the primary frequency components which will determine response by the nerves, muscles and heart. A focus will be placed on the thresholds for injury for dc created by rectification, with remnant 60-Hz ripple.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超过50/ 60hz和直流的触电危险
从交流(ac)电源频率(50和60赫兹)和从直接冲击的影响。电流(直流)已经研究了一个世纪,安全阈值现在在工人安全标准(即NFPA 70E)中有明确的定义。然而,其他频率和波形的冲击阈值在美国工人电气安全标准中没有明确规定。这包括除50/ 60hz以外的次射频(RF)频率(1hz至3khz), RF (3khz至100mhz)和混合波形,如调制直流。特别感兴趣的是400赫兹,直流与显著的交流纹波,和调制射频。这些波形存在于许多商业,工业和研究应用中,例如电池充电器,焊机等的直流输出,可能具有实质性的60 Hz纹波;电机变频驱动器的调制输出;逆变器;和更多。本文介绍了从冲击研究、国际标准和事故中了解到的这种波形。审查的材料包括现有的标准(如国际电工委员会(IEC)的冲击标准),对冲击效应的研究,以及对几起事故的审查。混合频率波形的傅里叶分析将显示决定神经、肌肉和心脏响应的主要频率成分。重点将放在整流产生的直流损伤阈值上,残余60 hz纹波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis of Epri Overhead Hv Line Arc Flash Model Analysis of Accidents Caused By Induced Current and Voltage on Transmission Lines and Substations Between 1985–2021 Electrical Shock Sequela Challenge Accepted: Specialty PPE for Shock and Arc Flash Protection The Impact – “Just an Electrician”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1