Protection of the Sole Dwelling in the Possession of the Bankrupt Citizen: Law Enforcement Issues.

A.G. Martseniuk
{"title":"Protection of the Sole Dwelling in the Possession of the Bankrupt Citizen: Law Enforcement Issues.","authors":"A.G. Martseniuk","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.2.7.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The important aspect while considering the bankruptcy of citizens represents issues that rise while realization of dwelling, in particular, when this dwelling is the only place of living that belong to the family of the bankrupt person. This dwelling is also the only place suitable for living for such family. In spite of the existing regulation of exclusion of such residential premises from the contest lot of premises when the dwelling is taken from the debtor. Representatives of the legal practice, taking into consideration the unscrupulous actions of the debtor, abuses from their part, have to take other approaches to the established executive immunity. The norms that regulate the issues of the realization of the sole dwelling of the bankrupt citizen, has to be more precise. In particular, there is the need to legally reinforce the requirements that are submitted to the sole dwelling of the debtor. Likewise, there is the necessity to establish the level of luxury of the sole dwelling. It is stated that this issue should be regulated by the lawmaker in accordance with the executive immunity and by meeting creditors’ requirements. Whereas, as it is stated, if the legislative regulations are absent and they do not allow determining the criteria of the sole dwelling of the debtor, it leads to various procedural complications when the case goes to court. In case of taking sole property of the debtor, his or her rights are violated as well as the rights of the members of his or her family and the rights of creditors.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.2.7.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The important aspect while considering the bankruptcy of citizens represents issues that rise while realization of dwelling, in particular, when this dwelling is the only place of living that belong to the family of the bankrupt person. This dwelling is also the only place suitable for living for such family. In spite of the existing regulation of exclusion of such residential premises from the contest lot of premises when the dwelling is taken from the debtor. Representatives of the legal practice, taking into consideration the unscrupulous actions of the debtor, abuses from their part, have to take other approaches to the established executive immunity. The norms that regulate the issues of the realization of the sole dwelling of the bankrupt citizen, has to be more precise. In particular, there is the need to legally reinforce the requirements that are submitted to the sole dwelling of the debtor. Likewise, there is the necessity to establish the level of luxury of the sole dwelling. It is stated that this issue should be regulated by the lawmaker in accordance with the executive immunity and by meeting creditors’ requirements. Whereas, as it is stated, if the legislative regulations are absent and they do not allow determining the criteria of the sole dwelling of the debtor, it leads to various procedural complications when the case goes to court. In case of taking sole property of the debtor, his or her rights are violated as well as the rights of the members of his or her family and the rights of creditors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破产公民独栋住宅的保护:执法问题。
在考虑公民破产时,重要的方面代表了在实现住宅时出现的问题,特别是当该住宅是属于破产者家庭的唯一居住场所时。这个住宅也是唯一适合这种家庭居住的地方。尽管现行法规规定,当房屋从债务人手中被夺走时,这种住宅房屋将被排除在竞争地段之外。法律实践的代表考虑到债务人的不道德行为,以及他们自己的滥用行为,必须对既定的行政豁免采取其他办法。规范破产公民唯一住所实现问题的规范必须更加精确。特别是,有必要在法律上加强对债务人唯一住所的要求。同样,有必要建立豪华的唯一住宅的水平。有人指出,这一问题应由立法者根据行政豁免和满足债权人的要求加以管制。然而,如前所述,如果没有立法条例,而且它们不允许确定债务人唯一住所的标准,则在案件提交法院时将导致各种程序上的复杂情况。如果征用债务人的个人财产,不仅侵犯了债务人的权利,还侵犯了债务人家庭成员的权利和债权人的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s SPECIALTY 12.00.15: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF SUBJECT MATTERS AND THE NUMBER OF DISSERTATIONS PRESENTED TO DEFENSE Electronic Investigation Technologies and Modern Format of Technical and Criminalistic Support for Criminal Cases Investigation ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE AIM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY AND MEANS OF ITS ACHIEVEMENT To the Issue of Business Trips in Labour Law of the Russian Federation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1