Comparison of Telehomecare Interventions in Controlling Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Zohreh Shoyukhi, Arezoo Dehghani Mahmoodabadi, H. Dehghan
{"title":"Comparison of Telehomecare Interventions in Controlling Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Zohreh Shoyukhi, Arezoo Dehghani Mahmoodabadi, H. Dehghan","doi":"10.18502/ccb.v2i2.7395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered the fourth main cause of mortality worldwide, affecting 10% of adults aged up to 40 years. Due to the growing elderly population and smoking, the global burden of COPD is expected to increase in the general population. Telemedicine may help patients with COPD to decrease exacerbation episodes and the associated costs. Moreover, Telehomecare (THC) may be considered as an alternative to cut down hospitalization costs and increase the patients’ comfort. \nObjectives: This study explains the methodology of a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to evaluate the impact of THC interventions on the control and management of COPD and its complications. \nMethods: To review all published studies comparing THC interventions in controlling COPD and its complications, all studies published in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane databases, HTA EED, DARE, Embase, SID, Magiran will be searched until the end of 2021.  Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, controlled clinical trials comparing telehealth with standard monitoring of COPD patients were included. Independent reviewers will review the abstracts and full-texts of all relevant studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and data extraction using structured forms. The meta-analysis will be performed for adequately homogenous studies regarding their populations, interventions, and objectives. \nConclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide useful information on the impacts of THC on COPD control. The evidence provided by this systematic review can be helpful for clinical specialists, public health policymakers, and the general population.","PeriodicalId":138934,"journal":{"name":"Critical Comments in Biomedicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Comments in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ccb.v2i2.7395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered the fourth main cause of mortality worldwide, affecting 10% of adults aged up to 40 years. Due to the growing elderly population and smoking, the global burden of COPD is expected to increase in the general population. Telemedicine may help patients with COPD to decrease exacerbation episodes and the associated costs. Moreover, Telehomecare (THC) may be considered as an alternative to cut down hospitalization costs and increase the patients’ comfort. Objectives: This study explains the methodology of a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to evaluate the impact of THC interventions on the control and management of COPD and its complications. Methods: To review all published studies comparing THC interventions in controlling COPD and its complications, all studies published in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane databases, HTA EED, DARE, Embase, SID, Magiran will be searched until the end of 2021.  Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, controlled clinical trials comparing telehealth with standard monitoring of COPD patients were included. Independent reviewers will review the abstracts and full-texts of all relevant studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and data extraction using structured forms. The meta-analysis will be performed for adequately homogenous studies regarding their populations, interventions, and objectives. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide useful information on the impacts of THC on COPD control. The evidence provided by this systematic review can be helpful for clinical specialists, public health policymakers, and the general population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程家庭护理干预控制慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)被认为是全球第四大死亡原因,影响10%的40岁以下成年人。由于老年人口和吸烟人数的增加,全球慢性阻塞性肺病负担预计将在普通人群中增加。远程医疗可以帮助慢性阻塞性肺病患者减少急性发作和相关费用。此外,远程家庭护理(THC)可以考虑作为一种替代方案,以减少住院费用和增加患者的舒适度。目的:本研究解释了一项系统综述和荟萃分析的方法,旨在评估四氢大麻酚干预对慢性阻塞性肺病及其并发症的控制和管理的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Google Scholar、Scopus、ISI Web of Science、Cochrane、HTA EED、DARE、Embase、SID、Magiran等数据库中发表的所有比较THC干预控制COPD及其并发症的已发表研究,检索时间截止到2021年底。包括随机对照试验(rct)、集群rct、对照临床试验,比较远程医疗与COPD患者的标准监测。独立审稿人将审查所有相关研究的摘要和全文的资格、偏倚风险和使用结构化表格的数据提取。荟萃分析将针对其人群、干预措施和目标进行充分的同质研究。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果将为四氢大麻酚对COPD控制的影响提供有用的信息。本系统综述提供的证据对临床专家、公共卫生政策制定者和一般人群都有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of telehomecare Studies in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A health Technology Assessment Study The Case Fatality Rate of Alpha Covid-19 Variant in Patients with Concurrent Diabetes or Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis The Neglected Role of Lung Microbiota in COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Burnout in Nurses The Relationship between Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1