A COMPARISON BETWEEN MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA IN ISLAMIC BANKING INDUSTRY

A. Abdullah
{"title":"A COMPARISON BETWEEN MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA IN ISLAMIC BANKING INDUSTRY","authors":"A. Abdullah","doi":"10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2017.705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- This paper aims to compare Malaysia and Indonesia in terms of current circumstances in the Islamic banking industry. This is very interesting because of several factors. Firstly these two countries are neighbors. Secondly, both countries have expressed their aspiration to be the center for the Islamic banking industry not only in the region but also in the world. Thirdly, both countries have significant differences in demographics and economic conditions. It is therefore very interesting to see which country is in a better position than other in the Islamic banking industry at present. This will help researchers to predict which country will achieve the target first if it occurs. Methodology- The comparison will focus on five selected items in Islamic banking institutions ie legal framework, court jurisdiction, capital growth, products offered and shariah governance. For legal frameworks, court jurisdiction and shariah governance analysis will be made on the basis of provisions in legislations and statutes in both countries. Comparison of the products offered will be analyzed based on the list of products and the amount involved. However, since profit sharing activities are regarded as a key feature of an Islamic banking system as argued by many authoritative scholars in this area, the involvement of Islamic banking institutions in profit sharing based products in both countries will be the main focus in the analysis. Capital growth is chosen because according to Sula (2011) the development of a bank, should be seen from the market share because the market share reflects the portion from the sale of industrial goods or services carried out by an industry. Prior to that, Shaffer (1993) reported that market share is important, because it reflects the performance associated with bank's competitive position in the banking industry. Findings- T he study shows that although both countries are making good progress in the Islamic banking industry, no country is far ahead of another. While Malaysia is ahead of Indonesia in some items, Indonesia is ahead of Malaysia in some other items.  Conclusion- This paper concludes that both countries have advantages and disadvantages of others in the Islamic banking industry. Hence both should overcome their weaknesses and continue to build from their strengths to make their aspirations a hub in the Islamic banking industry as a reality","PeriodicalId":376357,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Business Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2017.705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose- This paper aims to compare Malaysia and Indonesia in terms of current circumstances in the Islamic banking industry. This is very interesting because of several factors. Firstly these two countries are neighbors. Secondly, both countries have expressed their aspiration to be the center for the Islamic banking industry not only in the region but also in the world. Thirdly, both countries have significant differences in demographics and economic conditions. It is therefore very interesting to see which country is in a better position than other in the Islamic banking industry at present. This will help researchers to predict which country will achieve the target first if it occurs. Methodology- The comparison will focus on five selected items in Islamic banking institutions ie legal framework, court jurisdiction, capital growth, products offered and shariah governance. For legal frameworks, court jurisdiction and shariah governance analysis will be made on the basis of provisions in legislations and statutes in both countries. Comparison of the products offered will be analyzed based on the list of products and the amount involved. However, since profit sharing activities are regarded as a key feature of an Islamic banking system as argued by many authoritative scholars in this area, the involvement of Islamic banking institutions in profit sharing based products in both countries will be the main focus in the analysis. Capital growth is chosen because according to Sula (2011) the development of a bank, should be seen from the market share because the market share reflects the portion from the sale of industrial goods or services carried out by an industry. Prior to that, Shaffer (1993) reported that market share is important, because it reflects the performance associated with bank's competitive position in the banking industry. Findings- T he study shows that although both countries are making good progress in the Islamic banking industry, no country is far ahead of another. While Malaysia is ahead of Indonesia in some items, Indonesia is ahead of Malaysia in some other items.  Conclusion- This paper concludes that both countries have advantages and disadvantages of others in the Islamic banking industry. Hence both should overcome their weaknesses and continue to build from their strengths to make their aspirations a hub in the Islamic banking industry as a reality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚与印尼伊斯兰银行业比较
目的-本文旨在比较马来西亚和印度尼西亚在伊斯兰银行业的现状。这是非常有趣的,因为有几个因素。首先,这两个国家是邻国。第二,两国都表达了成为地区乃至世界伊斯兰银行业中心的愿望。第三,两国在人口和经济条件上存在显著差异。因此,看看目前哪个国家在伊斯兰银行业中比其他国家处于更好的地位是非常有趣的。这将有助于研究人员预测哪个国家将首先实现这一目标。方法-比较将集中在伊斯兰银行机构的五个选定项目上,即法律框架、法院管辖权、资本增长、提供的产品和伊斯兰教法治理。在法律框架方面,将根据两国立法和法规的规定对法院管辖权和伊斯兰教法治理进行分析。将根据产品清单和涉及金额对所提供产品进行比较分析。然而,正如该领域的许多权威学者所认为的那样,利润分享活动被视为伊斯兰银行体系的一个关键特征,因此,在这两个国家,伊斯兰银行机构参与基于利润分享的产品将是分析的主要焦点。之所以选择资本增长,是因为根据Sula(2011),银行的发展应该从市场份额来看,因为市场份额反映了一个行业所销售的工业品或服务的部分。在此之前,Shaffer(1993)报道了市场份额的重要性,因为它反映了银行在银行业中的竞争地位。研究结果-研究表明,尽管两国在伊斯兰银行业方面都取得了良好进展,但没有一个国家远远领先于另一个国家。虽然马来西亚在某些项目上领先于印度尼西亚,但印度尼西亚在其他一些项目上领先于马来西亚。结论-本文的结论是,两国在伊斯兰银行业有优势和劣势。因此,两者都应克服其弱点,继续发挥其优势,使其成为伊斯兰银行业中心的愿望成为现实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retaliation against employees in the USA: an analysis in terms of organizational behavior Dimensionality and validity of the operational performance construct in the aviation industry: a factor analytic approach The contribution of groupware systems to organizational communication and strategic management in Covid-19 epidemic period Determining the faulty and refund products in manufacturing system: application on a textile Firm Metro line on access to İstanbul airport and simulation study of the covid-19 effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1