{"title":"The epic adventures of an unknown particle","authors":"J. Katz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1426953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper, a mini-“Autour de ‘ταρ epique’,” is above all a contribution to the study of Homeric formulas and compositional technique. I give an overview and expand our understanding of the underappreciated Homeric particle ταρ (tar), whose Cuneiform Luvian cognate Calvert Watkins discovered over a decade ago and whose essential Greek-ness M. L. West accepts in his Teubner edition of the Iliad; demonstrate on linguistic and stylistic grounds that ταρ is part of the conjunction αὐτάρ (autar) but not of the semantically similar near-look-alike ἀτάρ (atar); and explain why this unstressed and almost unknown monosyllable is of unexpectedly wide interest, being not just a bit of Homeric and Indo-European linguistic trivia, but an important rhetorical device in the description of ancient Greek ritual.","PeriodicalId":178293,"journal":{"name":"Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1426953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper, a mini-“Autour de ‘ταρ epique’,” is above all a contribution to the study of Homeric formulas and compositional technique. I give an overview and expand our understanding of the underappreciated Homeric particle ταρ (tar), whose Cuneiform Luvian cognate Calvert Watkins discovered over a decade ago and whose essential Greek-ness M. L. West accepts in his Teubner edition of the Iliad; demonstrate on linguistic and stylistic grounds that ταρ is part of the conjunction αὐτάρ (autar) but not of the semantically similar near-look-alike ἀτάρ (atar); and explain why this unstressed and almost unknown monosyllable is of unexpectedly wide interest, being not just a bit of Homeric and Indo-European linguistic trivia, but an important rhetorical device in the description of ancient Greek ritual.