Beyond the Carrots and Sticks Paradigm: Rethinking the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Experience of Bulgaria and Romania†

Linka Toneva-Metodieva
{"title":"Beyond the Carrots and Sticks Paradigm: Rethinking the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Experience of Bulgaria and Romania†","authors":"Linka Toneva-Metodieva","doi":"10.1080/15705854.2014.936108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A paradigmatic change is urgently needed in European Union's approach towards post-accession conditionality, as demonstrated by the apparent failure of the ‘Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM)’ for Bulgaria and Romania to achieve its objective – assisting the establishment of the rule of law in the two countries. The article maintains that the predominating reward/sanction perspective on post-accession conditionality both in the academic literature and in political practice is inadequate for triggering genuine and sustainable reform progress in the Eastern European candidates. The particular conceptual and procedural deficiencies of the CVM for Bulgaria and Romania as a post-accession conditionality instrument are discussed. It is argued that the CVM has remained mostly an instrument for monitoring and assessment, while the cooperation aspect of the post-accession relationship with Bulgaria and Romania has been neglected. The article proposes an alternative approach, based on partnership.","PeriodicalId":186367,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2014.936108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Abstract A paradigmatic change is urgently needed in European Union's approach towards post-accession conditionality, as demonstrated by the apparent failure of the ‘Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM)’ for Bulgaria and Romania to achieve its objective – assisting the establishment of the rule of law in the two countries. The article maintains that the predominating reward/sanction perspective on post-accession conditionality both in the academic literature and in political practice is inadequate for triggering genuine and sustainable reform progress in the Eastern European candidates. The particular conceptual and procedural deficiencies of the CVM for Bulgaria and Romania as a post-accession conditionality instrument are discussed. It is argued that the CVM has remained mostly an instrument for monitoring and assessment, while the cooperation aspect of the post-accession relationship with Bulgaria and Romania has been neglected. The article proposes an alternative approach, based on partnership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越胡萝卜加大棒范式:对保加利亚和罗马尼亚合作与核查机制经验的再思考
保加利亚和罗马尼亚的“合作与核查机制”(CVM)在实现其协助两国建立法治的目标方面明显失败,这表明欧盟对加入欧盟后的条件限制的做法急需进行范式变革。文章认为,在学术文献和政治实践中,关于加入后条件的奖励/制裁观点占主导地位,不足以促使东欧候选国取得真正和可持续的改革进展。讨论了保加利亚和罗马尼亚加入后的附加条件文书在概念和程序上的特殊缺陷。有人认为,观察员团主要仍然是监测和评估的工具,而加入后与保加利亚和罗马尼亚关系的合作方面则被忽视了。本文提出了一种基于伙伴关系的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board page The EU as a global security actor: a comprehensive analysis beyond CFSP and JHA The Coverage of the Eurozone Economic Crisis in the British Press Instrumental Europeans? Minority Nationalist Parties’ Discourse on the European Union: The Case of UK Meso-Elections 1998–2011 Official Discrepancies: Kosovo Independence and Western European Rhetoric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1