A Comparison of Test Generation Algorithms for Testing Application Interactions

Antti Nieminen, A. Jääskeläinen, H. Virtanen, Mika Katara
{"title":"A Comparison of Test Generation Algorithms for Testing Application Interactions","authors":"Antti Nieminen, A. Jääskeläinen, H. Virtanen, Mika Katara","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2011.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing the interactions of different applications running in the same operating system or platform poses challenges for manual testing and conventional script-based automation. Towards this end, we have developed an online model-based testing solution allowing efficient testing of such interactions. This paper presents the results of the comparison of algorithms used for generating tests for interaction testing. The comparison is based on our experiments with a number of different algorithms as well as results from the earlier studies by others. Given the simplicity of implementation, Random Walk seems very useful and practical solution for online test generation. However, each of the compared algorithms has its strong points, making the selection dependent of the metric one wants to emphasize and the available a priori information. Especially when the execution of test events is slow, smarter algorithms have advantage over simple random walk.","PeriodicalId":309774,"journal":{"name":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2011.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Testing the interactions of different applications running in the same operating system or platform poses challenges for manual testing and conventional script-based automation. Towards this end, we have developed an online model-based testing solution allowing efficient testing of such interactions. This paper presents the results of the comparison of algorithms used for generating tests for interaction testing. The comparison is based on our experiments with a number of different algorithms as well as results from the earlier studies by others. Given the simplicity of implementation, Random Walk seems very useful and practical solution for online test generation. However, each of the compared algorithms has its strong points, making the selection dependent of the metric one wants to emphasize and the available a priori information. Especially when the execution of test events is slow, smarter algorithms have advantage over simple random walk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试应用程序交互的测试生成算法的比较
测试运行在相同操作系统或平台上的不同应用程序的交互对手动测试和传统的基于脚本的自动化提出了挑战。为此,我们开发了一种基于模型的在线测试解决方案,允许对此类交互进行有效的测试。本文介绍了用于交互测试的测试生成算法的比较结果。比较是基于我们对许多不同算法的实验以及其他人早期研究的结果。考虑到实现的简单性,随机漫步似乎是非常有用和实用的在线测试生成解决方案。然而,每种比较算法都有其优点,使得选择依赖于想要强调的度量和可用的先验信息。特别是当测试事件的执行速度较慢时,更智能的算法比简单的随机漫步更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Balancing Determinism, Memory Consumption and Throughput for RTSJ-Based Real-Time Applications BAM: A Requirements Validation and Verification Framework for Business Process Models The IntiSa Approach: Test Input Data Generation for Non-primitive Data Types by Means of SMT Solver Based Bounded Model Checking Implementing Service Collaboration Based on Decentralized Mediation An Automatic Performance Modeling Approach to Capacity Planning for Multi-service Web Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1