Determinacy of Interest Rate Rules with Bond Transaction Services in a Cashless Economy

Massimiliano Marzo, P. Zagaglia
{"title":"Determinacy of Interest Rate Rules with Bond Transaction Services in a Cashless Economy","authors":"Massimiliano Marzo, P. Zagaglia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1300353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canzoneri and Diba (2004) show that the Taylor principle is not a panacea for equilibrium determinacy in a model where bonds and money provide liquidity services to households. We consider a cashless New Keynesian model with two types of government bonds. One bond provides transaction services, whereas the other is used only as a store of value. We show that the Taylor principle is still sacrosanct, and that the results of Leeper (1991) are confirmed.","PeriodicalId":346619,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1300353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Canzoneri and Diba (2004) show that the Taylor principle is not a panacea for equilibrium determinacy in a model where bonds and money provide liquidity services to households. We consider a cashless New Keynesian model with two types of government bonds. One bond provides transaction services, whereas the other is used only as a store of value. We show that the Taylor principle is still sacrosanct, and that the results of Leeper (1991) are confirmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无现金经济中债券交易服务利率规则的确定性
Canzoneri和Diba(2004)表明,在债券和货币为家庭提供流动性服务的模型中,泰勒原则不是均衡确定性的灵丹妙药。我们考虑一个无现金的新凯恩斯模型与两种类型的政府债券。一种债券提供交易服务,而另一种债券仅用作价值储存。我们证明了泰勒原理仍然是神圣不可侵犯的,并且证实了Leeper(1991)的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Environmental Tax Reform in Japan An Empirical Equilibrium Model of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Developing Countries Bank Lending, Financial Frictions, and Inside Money Creation Robust Predictions for DSGE Models with Incomplete Information Evaluating Central Banks&Apos; Tool Kit: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1