The Catholic Epistles:

D. Horrell
{"title":"The Catholic Epistles:","authors":"D. Horrell","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt22h6rxv.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Catholic Epistles, despite being grouped and named as such since at least the fourth century (HE 3.23.25) and appearing along with Acts in the textual tradition as the Apostolos, do not constitute a collection of texts with a distinctive and closely shared theological perspective. Add to this much neglected collection the letter to the Hebrews, often attributed to Paul in the early tradition (e.g. Clement of Alexandria in HE 6.14.24) but now never seriously argued to be his, and we have a group of texts which, while sharing internally and with other early Christian texts some common theological convictions, encompasses considerable variety. It would therefore seem appropriate to consider each text’s individual perspective, rather than offer a synthetic treatment. In order to make my task manageable in the available space, I shall focus on three examples from this group of letters: James, Hebrews, and 1 Peter. (The Johannine Epistles are considered along with the Gospel of John in chapter 7.) I shall take as my key questions the following: What is the character of the messianism evident in this text? What notion and means of redemption is envisaged, and how is this related to the text’s messianism? And in what ways, if at all, does this particular type of messianism represent a form of resistance? For our general understanding of what constitutes messianism we may follow William Horbury’s broad definition: ‘the expectation of a coming pre-eminent ruler’, including ‘the treatment of a present ruler in a messianic way’ (Horbury 1998: 7). The term Messiah, ‘in its etymological sense’, denotes ‘God’s eschatological Anointed One, the Messiah’ (Charlesworth 1992: 4). I should also make clear that in this essay my primary aim is to outline the contours of the specifically ‘Christian’ messianism set out in James, Hebrews, and 1 Peter, rather than to determine whether this depiction of Jesus does or does not derive from an existing facet of Jewish messianic belief. Redemption may be understood in a broad sense to refer to the means by which those in some kind of negative situation – whether of suffering, oppression, or their own wickedness – may be rescued from that situation by some other (person/divinity, etc.), and more specifically, and etymologically, as the act of purchasing back, or freeing by payment of ransom. My understanding of what constitutes resistance, and the forms it may take, is primarily shaped by the work of James C. Scott, especially his already classic","PeriodicalId":151594,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy of the New Testament, 8th Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy of the New Testament, 8th Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt22h6rxv.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Catholic Epistles, despite being grouped and named as such since at least the fourth century (HE 3.23.25) and appearing along with Acts in the textual tradition as the Apostolos, do not constitute a collection of texts with a distinctive and closely shared theological perspective. Add to this much neglected collection the letter to the Hebrews, often attributed to Paul in the early tradition (e.g. Clement of Alexandria in HE 6.14.24) but now never seriously argued to be his, and we have a group of texts which, while sharing internally and with other early Christian texts some common theological convictions, encompasses considerable variety. It would therefore seem appropriate to consider each text’s individual perspective, rather than offer a synthetic treatment. In order to make my task manageable in the available space, I shall focus on three examples from this group of letters: James, Hebrews, and 1 Peter. (The Johannine Epistles are considered along with the Gospel of John in chapter 7.) I shall take as my key questions the following: What is the character of the messianism evident in this text? What notion and means of redemption is envisaged, and how is this related to the text’s messianism? And in what ways, if at all, does this particular type of messianism represent a form of resistance? For our general understanding of what constitutes messianism we may follow William Horbury’s broad definition: ‘the expectation of a coming pre-eminent ruler’, including ‘the treatment of a present ruler in a messianic way’ (Horbury 1998: 7). The term Messiah, ‘in its etymological sense’, denotes ‘God’s eschatological Anointed One, the Messiah’ (Charlesworth 1992: 4). I should also make clear that in this essay my primary aim is to outline the contours of the specifically ‘Christian’ messianism set out in James, Hebrews, and 1 Peter, rather than to determine whether this depiction of Jesus does or does not derive from an existing facet of Jewish messianic belief. Redemption may be understood in a broad sense to refer to the means by which those in some kind of negative situation – whether of suffering, oppression, or their own wickedness – may be rescued from that situation by some other (person/divinity, etc.), and more specifically, and etymologically, as the act of purchasing back, or freeing by payment of ransom. My understanding of what constitutes resistance, and the forms it may take, is primarily shaped by the work of James C. Scott, especially his already classic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天主教书信:
天主教书信,尽管至少从四世纪开始就被归类和命名,并且在文本传统中与使徒行传一起出现,作为使徒,并没有构成一个具有独特和紧密共享的神学观点的文本集合。再加上这封被忽视的希伯来书,在早期的传统中经常被认为是保罗写的(例如,在《希伯来书》6.14.24中,亚历山大的克莱门特),但现在从来没有认真地认为是他写的,我们有一组文本,虽然在内部和其他早期基督教文本中分享了一些共同的神学信念,但包含了相当多的多样性。因此,似乎应该考虑每一份案文的个别观点,而不是提供综合处理。为了使我的任务在有限的时间内易于完成,我将集中讨论这组书信中的三个例子:雅各书、希伯来书和彼得前书。(《约翰书信》和《约翰福音》在第7章一起被考虑。)我将把下列问题作为我的关键问题:在这段经文中,弥赛亚主义的特征是什么?救赎的概念和手段是什么,这与文本的弥赛亚主义有什么关系?如果有的话,这种特殊类型的弥赛亚主义在哪些方面代表了一种抵抗?对于弥赛亚主义的一般理解,我们可以遵循William Horbury的广义定义:“对即将到来的卓越统治者的期望”,包括“以弥赛亚的方式对待现在的统治者”(Horbury 1998: 7)。“弥赛亚”一词,“在其词源意义上”,表示“上帝末世的受膏者,弥赛亚”(Charlesworth 1992:4)我还应该明确指出,在这篇文章中,我的主要目的是勾勒出《雅各书》、《希伯来书》和《彼得前书》中具体的“基督教”弥赛亚主义的轮廓,而不是确定这种对耶稣的描述是否源自犹太人弥赛亚信仰的一个现有方面。救赎可以从广义上理解为那些处于某种消极情况下的人——无论是痛苦、压迫还是他们自己的邪恶——可能被其他人(人/神等)从这种情况中拯救出来的手段,更具体地说,从词源上讲,是通过支付赎金来赎回或释放的行为。我对什么是抵抗的理解,以及抵抗可能采取的形式,主要是受詹姆斯·c·斯科特(James C. Scott)作品的影响,尤其是他已经很经典的作品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Deutero-Pauline Letters: The Catholic Epistles: EPILOGUE: Introduction to the Gospels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1