Strategic forces

J. Schlesinger
{"title":"Strategic forces","authors":"J. Schlesinger","doi":"10.1080/04597226208459689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long-term and quite well-known factor is that, over many years, the Soviets have been steadily closing the gap in nuclear capabilities between them and us. For a period of time prior to 1960, the United States had a virtual nuclear monopoly. By 1960, it was perceived that our monopoly advantage would ebb; and, in fact, it not only began to ebb, but, by 1966-67, the soviet Union had a very substantial intercontinental counter-deterrent. During the early 1960s, it was stated quite clearly by President Kennedy--and also by a large majority of Americans in both parties--that the United States needed alternatives other than suicide or surrender, that it needed options which did not imply immediate escalation to major nuclear war.","PeriodicalId":296860,"journal":{"name":"Russia’s Military Modernisation","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia’s Military Modernisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597226208459689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-term and quite well-known factor is that, over many years, the Soviets have been steadily closing the gap in nuclear capabilities between them and us. For a period of time prior to 1960, the United States had a virtual nuclear monopoly. By 1960, it was perceived that our monopoly advantage would ebb; and, in fact, it not only began to ebb, but, by 1966-67, the soviet Union had a very substantial intercontinental counter-deterrent. During the early 1960s, it was stated quite clearly by President Kennedy--and also by a large majority of Americans in both parties--that the United States needed alternatives other than suicide or surrender, that it needed options which did not imply immediate escalation to major nuclear war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略力量
长期和众所周知的因素是,多年来,苏联一直在稳步缩小与我们在核能力方面的差距。在1960年之前的一段时间里,美国实际上拥有核垄断地位。到1960年,人们认为我们的垄断优势将会衰退;事实上,它不仅开始衰落,而且到1966-67年,苏联拥有了非常强大的洲际反威慑力量。在20世纪60年代早期,肯尼迪总统以及两党绝大多数美国人都明确表示,除了自杀或投降之外,美国需要其他选择,它需要的选择不会立即升级为重大核战争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Russia’s approach to military decision-making and joint operations Strategic forces Russia’s armed forces since the end of the Cold War Naval forces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1