Konsekuensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Terhadap Hak Mewaris Anak Luar Kawin Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional

Achmad Khozin Baharudin, Septian Arya Budi Mahesa, Fadila Fernanda
{"title":"Konsekuensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Terhadap Hak Mewaris Anak Luar Kawin Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional","authors":"Achmad Khozin Baharudin, Septian Arya Budi Mahesa, Fadila Fernanda","doi":"10.36418/jiss.v4i1.770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legality of an illegitimate child in Indonesia has been fundamentally regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code in Article 280 and the admission is stated in Article 284, if the child has been avowed by the biological father upon the biological mother’s approval. The problem arise in the Constitutional Court Adjudication Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, which became a normic problem that makes as if there is a dualism in the familial system; inside and outside legal marriage, in which this is considered as legalizing non-marriage relationship among Indonesian citizens. Another problem arise about the distribution of inheritance law for illegitimate children in the Constutional Court Adjudication Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, that makes an illegitimate child have the same inheritance right with a legitimate child. Surely, this does not align with the Principle of Justice, especially for the legitimate child. The research method used in this Journal is the normative law research, which is a textual law research that leans into normic law that exists in the international regulations and legislational regulations, this research especially uses the Constitutional Court Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, and the Indonesian Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v4i1.770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legality of an illegitimate child in Indonesia has been fundamentally regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code in Article 280 and the admission is stated in Article 284, if the child has been avowed by the biological father upon the biological mother’s approval. The problem arise in the Constitutional Court Adjudication Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, which became a normic problem that makes as if there is a dualism in the familial system; inside and outside legal marriage, in which this is considered as legalizing non-marriage relationship among Indonesian citizens. Another problem arise about the distribution of inheritance law for illegitimate children in the Constutional Court Adjudication Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, that makes an illegitimate child have the same inheritance right with a legitimate child. Surely, this does not align with the Principle of Justice, especially for the legitimate child. The research method used in this Journal is the normative law research, which is a textual law research that leans into normic law that exists in the international regulations and legislational regulations, this research especially uses the Constitutional Court Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 about the Inheritence Right of an Inllegitimate Child, and the Indonesian Civil Code.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法法院裁决的结果:2010年46日/ puuviii /根据国家法律,对非婚生子女的权利提出质疑
在印度尼西亚,《印度尼西亚民法典》第280条对私生子的合法性作了基本规定,第284条规定,如果生父经生母同意宣誓生子,则承认私生子。宪法法院关于非婚生子女的继承权的第46/PUU-VIII/2010号判决书中出现了这一问题,这一问题已成为一个普遍问题,似乎在家庭制度中存在二元论;在合法婚姻内外,这被认为是将印尼公民之间的非婚姻关系合法化。宪法法院关于非婚生子女的继承权的第46/PUU-VIII/2010号判决书规定,非婚生子女的继承权与婚生子女的继承权相同,这也引发了关于非婚生子女的继承权分配的问题。当然,这是不符合正义原则的,特别是对于合法的孩子。本文采用的研究方法是规范性法研究,即借鉴国际法规和立法规范中存在的规范性法进行文本法研究,特别使用了宪法法院第46/PUU-VIII/2010号关于非婚生子女继承权的判例和印尼民法典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Storytelling Method in Developing Children's Receptive and Expressive Language Skills in Raudhatul Athfal Nurul Islam Batam City Accountability Of The Indonesian National Army Member Who Commited Corruption Crime On The Housing Obligatory Savings For Army 2020 Strengthening the Role of Advocates in Providing Legal Assistance to Indonesian Society Efforts To Increase Economic Growth By Reducing The Poverty Rate of West Sumatra Province Analysis of Affecting Variables Actual Inflation Rate at Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1