Prosthetic Gods, Projected Monsters

Filip Andjelkovic
{"title":"Prosthetic Gods, Projected Monsters","authors":"Filip Andjelkovic","doi":"10.58997/jgm.v3i1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines several narratives of techno-horror in literature and film. Special attention is paid to the recurring trope of monstrosity arising from a technologically augmented sense of sight. Utilizing a psychoanalytically informed analysis, this paper argues that fictions can express latent, untenable dimensions of very real experiences. In the case of techno-horror, narratives of sight, imagination, and projection-made-monstrous are rooted in contemporary relationships with technology and its capacity for depicting and transmitting unconscious fantasies. In this relationship, the technological is the extension of a tangible category of humanity, while nevertheless containing the fear that this extension dissolves its stability.\nThus, the genre of techno-horror is unique in expressing the role of unconscious fantasies – our unattainable ideals for becoming “prosthetic Gods,” as Freud put it (1930) – in our relationship with technology. Like the ideal of transcendence in religion, this technological ideal is a desire for both an impossible future, as well as the wish to return to an equally impossible, infantile past. Ultimately, this paper suggests that techno-horror narratives are expressions of a failure in taking responsibility for the othered unconscious fantasies that motivate our relationship with technology. Understanding these narratives within the context of psychoanalytic projection and situating them within the long tradition of imagining a transcendence of the human subject affords a better understanding of the cultural work accomplished by these contemporary expressions of the human-made-monstrous.","PeriodicalId":405772,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Gods and Monsters","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Gods and Monsters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58997/jgm.v3i1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines several narratives of techno-horror in literature and film. Special attention is paid to the recurring trope of monstrosity arising from a technologically augmented sense of sight. Utilizing a psychoanalytically informed analysis, this paper argues that fictions can express latent, untenable dimensions of very real experiences. In the case of techno-horror, narratives of sight, imagination, and projection-made-monstrous are rooted in contemporary relationships with technology and its capacity for depicting and transmitting unconscious fantasies. In this relationship, the technological is the extension of a tangible category of humanity, while nevertheless containing the fear that this extension dissolves its stability. Thus, the genre of techno-horror is unique in expressing the role of unconscious fantasies – our unattainable ideals for becoming “prosthetic Gods,” as Freud put it (1930) – in our relationship with technology. Like the ideal of transcendence in religion, this technological ideal is a desire for both an impossible future, as well as the wish to return to an equally impossible, infantile past. Ultimately, this paper suggests that techno-horror narratives are expressions of a failure in taking responsibility for the othered unconscious fantasies that motivate our relationship with technology. Understanding these narratives within the context of psychoanalytic projection and situating them within the long tradition of imagining a transcendence of the human subject affords a better understanding of the cultural work accomplished by these contemporary expressions of the human-made-monstrous.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假体神,投射怪物
本文考察了文学和电影中科技恐怖的几种叙事方式。特别注意的是由技术增强的视觉产生的怪物的反复出现的比喻。利用精神分析的信息分析,本文认为小说可以表达非常真实的经验的潜在的,站不住脚的维度。就科技恐怖而言,视觉、想象和投射的叙事——制造的怪物——根植于当代与技术的关系,以及它描绘和传播无意识幻想的能力。在这种关系中,技术是人类有形类别的延伸,同时也包含着这种延伸会破坏其稳定性的恐惧。因此,技术恐怖类型在表达无意识幻想的角色方面是独一无二的——正如弗洛伊德(1930)所说,我们成为“假神”的无法实现的理想——在我们与技术的关系中。就像宗教中的超越理想一样,这种技术理想既是对不可能的未来的渴望,也是对回到同样不可能的、幼稚的过去的渴望。最后,这篇论文表明,科技恐怖叙事是一种失败的表现,它没有对激发我们与科技关系的其他无意识幻想负责。在精神分析投射的背景下理解这些叙事,并将它们置于想象人类主体超越的悠久传统中,可以更好地理解这些当代人类制造的怪物表达所完成的文化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prosthetic Gods, Projected Monsters Review of Christopher Bell. The Dalai Lama and the Nechung Oracle “I can’t shake the feeling that You must have saved me for something greater than this” Review of Suicide Forest Village Ghost Hunters' Demonic Encounters as Religious Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1