FOOD SECURITY AS THE BASIS OF NATIONAL SECURITY

P. Koguashvili, Joseph Archvadze, N. Chikhladze
{"title":"FOOD SECURITY AS THE BASIS OF NATIONAL SECURITY","authors":"P. Koguashvili, Joseph Archvadze, N. Chikhladze","doi":"10.52244/ep.2022.23.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the central problems of an independent state is the provision of its food security, that is, its ability to provide citizens with basic food products, through proper production practices and import operations. It may safely be said that for every country, more so in the relatively newly independent States, it is an even existential challenge.\n\nDespite a full understanding of the problem, its definitive and comprehensive solution is complicated by a trivial problem - limited resources, which is why the extent to which subsidy is provided by the developed countries (per unit of output, per employee or agricultural land), is far beyond the capacity of the developing countries and countries with economies in transition (that would also include Georgia). In such countries, a stereotype picture emerges: food demand remains inelastic, but low purchasing power among a large segment of the population, the weak economy and the limited capacities of providing subsidies artificially lower demand for food. In post-socialist countries with the economies in transition the situation is aggravated by the violation of the social (in fact, political) subsidy system, which has substantially changed the proportions between the volumes of consumed food products. In Georgia, almost 2/3 of the total calories consumed by the population come from food products of plant origin, which is 1.5 times higher than the recommended proportions. The main reason is that the cost of every 1000 kcal from products of plant origin consumed by the population is about 3-4 times cheaper than the cost of the same number of calories from products of animal origin. As a result, the cost of the food basket is formally reduced, a formal basis is created for reducing the subsistence minimum, but at the same time, the proportions are broken between the volumes of the consumption of proteins, fats, carbohydrates by members of society.\n\nThe common pattern is to remain in force: the high correlation of food security with the level of economic development of the State, or with the macroeconomic situation. In this regard, despite the fact that the dynamics of output and value added created in the agricultural sector in recent years is no longer inferior to the dynamics of national product, but already is slightly higher (in 2020, compared to 2012, the scale of output in the agricultural sector increased by 24.6%, while in other sectors of the national economy (23.3%), the situation in this sector of the economy, especially in terms of food security, is still clearly unsatisfactory. In order to meet citizens food needs, it becomes necessary to import vast quantities of food products, whose average annual volume exceeded $1.2 billion in 2011-2020.\n\nAlong with the objective circumstances impeding food security (primarily weakness of the economy), the process is also negatively affected by factors such as the insufficient political will of the ruling powers and the lack of competences of decision makers, and consequently, low levels of their productivity.\n\nGeorgia, just like other civilized nations, needs to give priority attention to the agricultural sector. Priorities in this area can be in two directions: first, the preservation of the village as a territorial and social unit (this task also includes the protection of cultural and wild landscapes); second, the establishment of an agricultural sectoral structure to ensure food security.\n\nFood security is a State priority. The only entity that can solve this problem is the State itself. Achieving success on this issue in many ways depends on the effectiveness of public administration of the State as an economic entity, that is integrated with the improvement of agricultural production, its transformation into a high-tech sector and large-scale socio-economic, cultural and technical development of the rural population.\n\nWe still import more than 70% of the food we need. If we want to improve the trade balance by 2027, we must significantly increase agricultural production in order to reduce foreign exchange spent on food imports.","PeriodicalId":344544,"journal":{"name":"Economic Profile","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Profile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52244/ep.2022.23.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the central problems of an independent state is the provision of its food security, that is, its ability to provide citizens with basic food products, through proper production practices and import operations. It may safely be said that for every country, more so in the relatively newly independent States, it is an even existential challenge. Despite a full understanding of the problem, its definitive and comprehensive solution is complicated by a trivial problem - limited resources, which is why the extent to which subsidy is provided by the developed countries (per unit of output, per employee or agricultural land), is far beyond the capacity of the developing countries and countries with economies in transition (that would also include Georgia). In such countries, a stereotype picture emerges: food demand remains inelastic, but low purchasing power among a large segment of the population, the weak economy and the limited capacities of providing subsidies artificially lower demand for food. In post-socialist countries with the economies in transition the situation is aggravated by the violation of the social (in fact, political) subsidy system, which has substantially changed the proportions between the volumes of consumed food products. In Georgia, almost 2/3 of the total calories consumed by the population come from food products of plant origin, which is 1.5 times higher than the recommended proportions. The main reason is that the cost of every 1000 kcal from products of plant origin consumed by the population is about 3-4 times cheaper than the cost of the same number of calories from products of animal origin. As a result, the cost of the food basket is formally reduced, a formal basis is created for reducing the subsistence minimum, but at the same time, the proportions are broken between the volumes of the consumption of proteins, fats, carbohydrates by members of society. The common pattern is to remain in force: the high correlation of food security with the level of economic development of the State, or with the macroeconomic situation. In this regard, despite the fact that the dynamics of output and value added created in the agricultural sector in recent years is no longer inferior to the dynamics of national product, but already is slightly higher (in 2020, compared to 2012, the scale of output in the agricultural sector increased by 24.6%, while in other sectors of the national economy (23.3%), the situation in this sector of the economy, especially in terms of food security, is still clearly unsatisfactory. In order to meet citizens food needs, it becomes necessary to import vast quantities of food products, whose average annual volume exceeded $1.2 billion in 2011-2020. Along with the objective circumstances impeding food security (primarily weakness of the economy), the process is also negatively affected by factors such as the insufficient political will of the ruling powers and the lack of competences of decision makers, and consequently, low levels of their productivity. Georgia, just like other civilized nations, needs to give priority attention to the agricultural sector. Priorities in this area can be in two directions: first, the preservation of the village as a territorial and social unit (this task also includes the protection of cultural and wild landscapes); second, the establishment of an agricultural sectoral structure to ensure food security. Food security is a State priority. The only entity that can solve this problem is the State itself. Achieving success on this issue in many ways depends on the effectiveness of public administration of the State as an economic entity, that is integrated with the improvement of agricultural production, its transformation into a high-tech sector and large-scale socio-economic, cultural and technical development of the rural population. We still import more than 70% of the food we need. If we want to improve the trade balance by 2027, we must significantly increase agricultural production in order to reduce foreign exchange spent on food imports.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粮食安全是国家安全的基础
一个独立国家的核心问题之一是提供食品安全,也就是说,它有能力通过适当的生产实践和进口操作为公民提供基本的食品。可以有把握地说,对每一个国家,尤其是相对新近独立的国家来说,这是一项甚至关乎生死存亡的挑战。尽管对这一问题有充分的了解,但由于资源有限这一微不足道的问题,使其最终和全面的解决办法复杂化,这就是为什么发达国家提供补贴的程度(每单位产出、每名雇员或每片农业用地)远远超出发展中国家和经济转型期国家(也包括格鲁吉亚)的能力。在这些国家,出现了一种刻板印象:粮食需求仍然没有弹性,但大部分人口的购买力低、经济疲软和提供补贴的能力有限人为地降低了对粮食的需求。在经济转型的后社会主义国家,由于违反了社会(实际上是政治)补贴制度,这种情况更加恶化,这种制度大大改变了粮食产品消费量之间的比例。在格鲁吉亚,人口消耗的总热量中几乎有三分之二来自植物性食品,这比建议比例高出1.5倍。主要原因是,人口消耗的每1000千卡植物产品的成本比消耗同样数量的动物产品的成本便宜3-4倍。因此,食品篮子的成本正式降低,为降低最低生活水平创造了正式基础,但与此同时,社会成员对蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物的消费量之间的比例被打破。普遍的模式是继续有效:粮食安全与国家的经济发展水平或宏观经济形势高度相关。在这方面,尽管产出和增值的动态创建的农业部门近年来不再是劣等国民生产的动力,但已经略高(与2012年相比,2020年,农业产出的规模增长了24.6%,在国民经济的其他部门(23.3%),这种情况在这的经济部门,特别是在食品安全方面,显然仍不满意。为了满足公民的食品需求,有必要进口大量食品,2011-2020年平均每年进口超过12亿美元。除了阻碍粮食安全的客观情况(主要是经济疲软)外,这一进程还受到诸如统治国家政治意愿不足和决策者缺乏能力等因素的不利影响,因此,他们的生产力水平较低。格鲁吉亚同其他文明国家一样,需要优先重视农业部门。这一领域的优先事项可以有两个方向:首先,将村庄作为一个领土和社会单位进行保护(这项任务还包括保护文化和野生景观);二是建立农业部门结构,保障粮食安全。粮食安全是国家的优先事项。能够解决这一问题的唯一实体是国家本身。在这个问题上取得成功在许多方面取决于国家作为一个经济实体的公共行政的有效性,这种有效性与改善农业生产、将其转变为高科技部门以及农村人口的大规模社会经济、文化和技术发展结合在一起。我们仍然需要进口70%以上的粮食。如果我们想在2027年之前改善贸易平衡,我们必须大幅增加农业生产,以减少用于食品进口的外汇支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OUTSOURCING AS AN ACTOR IN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT THE PROBLEMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESCRIPTION INSTITUTION IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE IN GEORGIA EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION AND INTERNAL MARKETING PROBLEMS IN GEORGIA INNOVATIONS IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM AND RELATED TO IT PROBLEMS THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM BUSINESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1