Understanding Aesthetics of Interaction: A Repertory Grid Study

Mati Mõttus, E. Karapanos, D. Lamas, G. Cockton
{"title":"Understanding Aesthetics of Interaction: A Repertory Grid Study","authors":"Mati Mõttus, E. Karapanos, D. Lamas, G. Cockton","doi":"10.1145/2971485.2996755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work in progress paper explores users' perceptions of the aesthetics of interaction. We describe a qualitative study using the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) that elicited individuals' personal constructs, bipolar adjectives such as beautiful vs ugly that characterize individuals' idiosyncratic ways of classifying and differentiating between a set of stimuli. The constructs were sorted by similarity, resulting in a set of aesthetic categories. Quantitative data (i.e., participants' ratings) from the RGT further enables us to assess the internal consistency of the emerging categories as well as to chart the design space of aesthetic interactions. All in all, 23 categories of aesthetics of interaction were established based on users' perceptions. These categories partially corroborated (e.g., speed, proximity, complexity) but also expanded (e.g., natural realism, congruence, dimensionality) prior work on experience qualities in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).","PeriodicalId":190768,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This work in progress paper explores users' perceptions of the aesthetics of interaction. We describe a qualitative study using the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) that elicited individuals' personal constructs, bipolar adjectives such as beautiful vs ugly that characterize individuals' idiosyncratic ways of classifying and differentiating between a set of stimuli. The constructs were sorted by similarity, resulting in a set of aesthetic categories. Quantitative data (i.e., participants' ratings) from the RGT further enables us to assess the internal consistency of the emerging categories as well as to chart the design space of aesthetic interactions. All in all, 23 categories of aesthetics of interaction were established based on users' perceptions. These categories partially corroborated (e.g., speed, proximity, complexity) but also expanded (e.g., natural realism, congruence, dimensionality) prior work on experience qualities in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解交互的美学:一个储备网格研究
这篇正在进行的论文探讨了用户对交互美学的看法。我们描述了一项使用存储网格技术(RGT)的定性研究,该研究激发了个体的个人构式,双极性形容词,如美与丑,表征了个体对一组刺激进行分类和区分的特殊方式。这些构念按相似性排序,形成一套美学范畴。来自RGT的定量数据(即参与者的评分)进一步使我们能够评估新兴类别的内部一致性,并绘制美学交互的设计空间。总的来说,基于用户的感知建立了23个交互美学类别。这些类别部分证实了(例如,速度,接近性,复杂性),但也扩展了(例如,自然现实性,一致性,维度)先前在人机交互(HCI)中关于经验质量的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Two Case Studies for Enhancing the Meaning of the Real Space Understanding Fidget Widgets: Exploring the Design Space of Embodied Self-Regulation Designing eHealth Services for Patients and Relatives: Critical Incidents and Lessons to Learn Eliciting Mid-Air Gestures for Wall-Display Interaction Spaghetti, Sink and Sarcophagus: Design Explorations of Tactile Artworks for Visually Impaired People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1