DISCOMFORT GLARE CUT-OFF VALUES FROM FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES

C. Pierson, M. S. Khanie, M. Bodart, J. Wienold
{"title":"DISCOMFORT GLARE CUT-OFF VALUES FROM FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES","authors":"C. Pierson, M. S. Khanie, M. Bodart, J. Wienold","doi":"10.25039/X46.2019.OP41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the application of discomfort glare metrics, a categorisation is used, dividing the metric scale into categories of perception. These categories are separated by borderline values, or so-called cut-off values. Recent literature shows that these cut-off values are lower when they are derived from field study data than those derived from laboratory study data. To investigate this further, the data from one field study and two laboratory studies was used to derive and compare cut-off values corresponding to three borderlines. The results show that the field study cut-off values were systematically lower than the laboratory study ones, implying that discomfort glare is reported at lower stimulus magnitudes in the field. Although further research is required on that topic, several hypotheses are discussed in order to explain the gap between cut-off values derived from field data and cut-off values derived from laboratory data. Recommendations for future studies are also provided.","PeriodicalId":121032,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25039/X46.2019.OP41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

For the application of discomfort glare metrics, a categorisation is used, dividing the metric scale into categories of perception. These categories are separated by borderline values, or so-called cut-off values. Recent literature shows that these cut-off values are lower when they are derived from field study data than those derived from laboratory study data. To investigate this further, the data from one field study and two laboratory studies was used to derive and compare cut-off values corresponding to three borderlines. The results show that the field study cut-off values were systematically lower than the laboratory study ones, implying that discomfort glare is reported at lower stimulus magnitudes in the field. Although further research is required on that topic, several hypotheses are discussed in order to explain the gap between cut-off values derived from field data and cut-off values derived from laboratory data. Recommendations for future studies are also provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现场和实验室研究得出的不适眩光截止值
对于不适眩光指标的应用,使用了分类,将度量尺度划分为感知类别。这些类别由边界值或所谓的临界值分开。最近的文献表明,从实地研究数据得出的这些临界值低于从实验室研究数据得出的临界值。为了进一步调查这一点,使用了一项实地研究和两项实验室研究的数据来推导和比较三条分界线对应的截止值。结果表明,现场研究的临界值系统地低于实验室研究的临界值,这意味着在较低的刺激强度下,现场报告了不适眩光。虽然需要对该主题进行进一步研究,但为了解释从实地数据得出的截止值与从实验室数据得出的截止值之间的差距,讨论了几个假设。并对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION UNDER CONTROLLED DAYLIGHT LEVELS AT DIFFERENT INDOOR TEMPERATURES LIGHTING, QUALITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT BY CCT TUNABLE LED HEADLAMP UNDER THE ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS TESTING THE PREDICTIVE POWER OF VISUAL DISCOMFORT FROM GLARE METRICS IN THE NEAR-WINDOW AND NEAR-WALL ZONES OF THE DAYLIT CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT AN INVESTIGATION OF A19 LED RETROFIT LAMPS IN THE TURKISH MARKET
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1