Deployment of Structural Foam in a Vehicle Roof System for Weight Reduction: Analytical/Experimental Verification

J. Alwan, Chi-Chin Wu, C. Chou
{"title":"Deployment of Structural Foam in a Vehicle Roof System for Weight Reduction: Analytical/Experimental Verification","authors":"J. Alwan, Chi-Chin Wu, C. Chou","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/amd-25435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The effect of structural foam (both polyurethane foam and Epoxy-based foam) on roof-crush resistance, when injected in the cavities of principal roof crush components, is investigated. Previously established design guide-lines have been used to optimize foam benefits by selecting appropriate foam density, and location of foam application. Finally, feasibility of downgaging a roof-crush system through optimized foam deployment and without affecting strength is evaluated.\n Two identical body-in-white (B-I-W) vehicles were used in this evaluation. One vehicle was considered as a base, while the other was injected with 9 pcf polyurethane foam at several critical locations. The foam density selection was based on the component study findings, while the foam location was determined based on a CAE analysis of the base model to locate plastic hinge formation and their sequence of occurrence. It was found that the maximum load was increased by 27% due to foam filling and the buckling strength increased by confining support. The total absorbing energy was increased by 25% due to the increase in the plastic moment capacity. Similar observations were registered when a 5 mm layer of Epoxy Based Foam was deployed in the same roof system.\n CAE roof-crush analysis performed on the tested (B-I-W) came in good correlation with the test results. Similar CAE analysis was performed on another vehicle roof-crush model; the maximum load was reported to increase by 26% and the total absorbed energy increased by 22% when the vehicle was injected with 9 pcf polyurethane foam at the pre-determined locations. Finally, the latest model was downgaged selectively by 20% with a minimum thickness of 0.68 mm. This resulted in a total weight saving of 6 Kgs. CAE analysis showed that the resulting loss in functionality of the system due to downgaging (resistance in this case) was totally compensated by foam deployment at the predetermined locations.","PeriodicalId":431388,"journal":{"name":"Crashworthiness of Composites and Lightweight Structures","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crashworthiness of Composites and Lightweight Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/amd-25435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of structural foam (both polyurethane foam and Epoxy-based foam) on roof-crush resistance, when injected in the cavities of principal roof crush components, is investigated. Previously established design guide-lines have been used to optimize foam benefits by selecting appropriate foam density, and location of foam application. Finally, feasibility of downgaging a roof-crush system through optimized foam deployment and without affecting strength is evaluated. Two identical body-in-white (B-I-W) vehicles were used in this evaluation. One vehicle was considered as a base, while the other was injected with 9 pcf polyurethane foam at several critical locations. The foam density selection was based on the component study findings, while the foam location was determined based on a CAE analysis of the base model to locate plastic hinge formation and their sequence of occurrence. It was found that the maximum load was increased by 27% due to foam filling and the buckling strength increased by confining support. The total absorbing energy was increased by 25% due to the increase in the plastic moment capacity. Similar observations were registered when a 5 mm layer of Epoxy Based Foam was deployed in the same roof system. CAE roof-crush analysis performed on the tested (B-I-W) came in good correlation with the test results. Similar CAE analysis was performed on another vehicle roof-crush model; the maximum load was reported to increase by 26% and the total absorbed energy increased by 22% when the vehicle was injected with 9 pcf polyurethane foam at the pre-determined locations. Finally, the latest model was downgaged selectively by 20% with a minimum thickness of 0.68 mm. This resulted in a total weight saving of 6 Kgs. CAE analysis showed that the resulting loss in functionality of the system due to downgaging (resistance in this case) was totally compensated by foam deployment at the predetermined locations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构泡沫在汽车车顶减重系统中的部署:分析/实验验证
研究了结构泡沫(聚氨酯泡沫和环氧基泡沫)注入顶板主要压碎部件的空腔时对顶板抗压性的影响。以前建立的设计准则已被用于通过选择适当的泡沫密度和泡沫应用的位置来优化泡沫的效益。最后,通过优化泡沫部署,在不影响强度的情况下,对顶板压溃系统进行降压的可行性进行了评价。在这次评估中使用了两辆相同的白车身(B-I-W)车辆。一辆车被认为是基础,而另一辆车在几个关键位置注入了9pcf聚氨酯泡沫。泡沫密度的选择是基于构件研究结果,而泡沫位置的确定是基于基础模型的CAE分析,以确定塑性铰的形成及其发生顺序。结果表明,泡沫填充可使最大载荷提高27%,围合支撑可提高屈曲强度。由于塑性弯矩容量的增加,总吸收能量增加了25%。当在相同的屋顶系统中部署5毫米的环氧基泡沫层时,也记录了类似的观察结果。对被试(B-I-W)进行的CAE顶压分析与测试结果具有良好的相关性。在另一个汽车顶压模型上进行了类似的CAE分析;据报道,当车辆在预定位置注入9 PCF聚氨酯泡沫时,最大载荷增加了26%,总吸收能量增加了22%。最后,对最新模型进行了20%的选择性下移,最小厚度为0.68 mm。CAE分析表明,由于下降(在这种情况下是阻力)导致的系统功能损失完全可以通过在预定位置部署泡沫来补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global Characterization of Failure Modes Under Impact Loading in Structural Components Made of Low Ductility Materials Studies on Headform Impact Design Deployment of Structural Foam in a Vehicle Roof System for Weight Reduction: Analytical/Experimental Verification Frontal Impact Test and Analysis on an Aluminum Front-End Structure Stochastic Applications in Crashworthiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1