{"title":"The impact of prep class education on effective English requestive e-mails written by students in Turkey","authors":"Begum Bacak","doi":"10.20535/2617-5339.2021.7.222550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past years, cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics have focused on native and non-native speech act descriptions, and only a small number of studies have investigated the preparatory class effect involved in speech act productions. To bridge the gap, this study aims to investigate the degree of directness and amount of lexical / phrasal internal and external modifications of requestive e-mails employed by 25 first grade students of English Language and Literature department with preparatory education and 25 first grade students of English Language and Literature department without preparatory education in their in a state university. It also aims to explore whether there is a difference between two groups according to the degree of imposition while making requests. The participants were given discourse completion tests in e-mail format including two different situations with low and high imposition levels and asked to write two requestive e-mails to their non-native professor. The e-mails were analyzed and classified based on Economidou-Kogetsidis’s (2011) framework which relies on Blum- Kulka et al. (1989) and Biesenbach-Lucas (2006, 2007). Based on the percentages and frequencies, the students with preparatory class education were compared to the students without preparatory class education, with respect to their usage of request strategies, lexical/phrasal internal modification and external modification. The results indicated that these two groups had both similarities and differences with respect to the degree of directness, the amount of internal and external modifications. Turkish ELL learners with and without prep class education employed more direct strategies in both situations. However, the group without prep class education employed more conventionally indirect strategies than the group with prep class education. None of the participants used non-conventionally indirect strategies. The group with prep class education used more internal modification than the group without prep class education. The most common internal modification was the consultative device in both groups. As for external modification, the group with prep class education utilized more supportive moves than the group without prep class education. Grounder was the most preferred supportive move by both groups.\n \nKeywords: Turkish ELL learners; requestive e-mails; academic e-mails; directness.\n ","PeriodicalId":404912,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Linguistics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-5339.2021.7.222550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
For the past years, cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics have focused on native and non-native speech act descriptions, and only a small number of studies have investigated the preparatory class effect involved in speech act productions. To bridge the gap, this study aims to investigate the degree of directness and amount of lexical / phrasal internal and external modifications of requestive e-mails employed by 25 first grade students of English Language and Literature department with preparatory education and 25 first grade students of English Language and Literature department without preparatory education in their in a state university. It also aims to explore whether there is a difference between two groups according to the degree of imposition while making requests. The participants were given discourse completion tests in e-mail format including two different situations with low and high imposition levels and asked to write two requestive e-mails to their non-native professor. The e-mails were analyzed and classified based on Economidou-Kogetsidis’s (2011) framework which relies on Blum- Kulka et al. (1989) and Biesenbach-Lucas (2006, 2007). Based on the percentages and frequencies, the students with preparatory class education were compared to the students without preparatory class education, with respect to their usage of request strategies, lexical/phrasal internal modification and external modification. The results indicated that these two groups had both similarities and differences with respect to the degree of directness, the amount of internal and external modifications. Turkish ELL learners with and without prep class education employed more direct strategies in both situations. However, the group without prep class education employed more conventionally indirect strategies than the group with prep class education. None of the participants used non-conventionally indirect strategies. The group with prep class education used more internal modification than the group without prep class education. The most common internal modification was the consultative device in both groups. As for external modification, the group with prep class education utilized more supportive moves than the group without prep class education. Grounder was the most preferred supportive move by both groups.
Keywords: Turkish ELL learners; requestive e-mails; academic e-mails; directness.
多年来,跨文化语用学和中介语用学的研究主要集中在母语和非母语语言行为的描述上,对语言行为产生过程中预备班效应的研究较少。为了弥补这一差距,本研究旨在调查25名受过预科教育的英语语言文学系一年级学生和25名未受过预科教育的英语语言文学系一年级学生在请求性电子邮件中使用的词汇/短语内部和外部修改的直接程度和数量。它还旨在探讨在提出请求时,根据征收程度,两个群体之间是否存在差异。研究人员以电子邮件的形式对参与者进行了话语完成测试,包括两种不同的低水平和高水平的情况,并要求参与者写两封要求性的电子邮件给他们的非母语教授。电子邮件的分析和分类基于Economidou-Kogetsidis(2011)的框架,该框架依赖于Blum- Kulka et al.(1989)和Biesenbach-Lucas(2006, 2007)。根据百分比和频次,比较接受过预科班教育的学生和未接受过预科班教育的学生在请求策略、词汇/短语内部修饰和外部修饰的使用情况。结果表明,这两组在直接程度、内部和外部修改的数量方面既有相似之处,也有差异。接受和未接受预科班教育的土耳其英语学习者在两种情况下都采用了更直接的策略。然而,没有接受预科班教育的小组比接受预科班教育的小组采用了更传统的间接策略。没有一个参与者使用非传统的间接策略。接受过预科班教育的小组比没有接受过预科班教育的小组使用了更多的内部修改。两组最常见的内部修改是咨询装置。在外部修饰方面,接受过预科班教育的组比未接受过预科班教育的组使用了更多的支持性动作。地表人是两组人最喜欢的支持动作。关键词:土耳其语外语学习者;requestive电子邮件;学术电子邮件;直率。