Holistic Assessment Methodology for Undergraduate Projects

T. V. Reddy, S. Kamesh, M. Prathap, K. Ravichand
{"title":"Holistic Assessment Methodology for Undergraduate Projects","authors":"T. V. Reddy, S. Kamesh, M. Prathap, K. Ravichand","doi":"10.1109/MITE.2016.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education in general and professional education in particular, graduates have to acquire required knowledge, specific skills and attitudes. Project work is one of the major components that aims at inculcating most of the required attributes in any undergraduate program. One of the most important activities of the practicing engineer is finding solutions to problems that arise by applying his knowledge and converting physical principles into useful devices/solutions. This involves creativity, imagination and reasonably strong analytical ability. These qualities can be nurtured in a systematic way. Realizing the importance of these aspects, project work plays a major role in achieving the above objective. The quality of the project work depends upon its selection process, size and complexity and support of the faculty-mentor. Some of the reputed institutes such as IITs follow the standard assessment mechanism to evaluate the quality of project work, but there is lot of scope for improvement. This paper discusses various aspects of improving assessment methods of project work and demonstrates an outcome based assessment method to evaluate the quality of project work in alignment with the recent guidelines introduced by National Board of Accreditation (NBA) for undergraduate programs.","PeriodicalId":407003,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2016.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Higher education in general and professional education in particular, graduates have to acquire required knowledge, specific skills and attitudes. Project work is one of the major components that aims at inculcating most of the required attributes in any undergraduate program. One of the most important activities of the practicing engineer is finding solutions to problems that arise by applying his knowledge and converting physical principles into useful devices/solutions. This involves creativity, imagination and reasonably strong analytical ability. These qualities can be nurtured in a systematic way. Realizing the importance of these aspects, project work plays a major role in achieving the above objective. The quality of the project work depends upon its selection process, size and complexity and support of the faculty-mentor. Some of the reputed institutes such as IITs follow the standard assessment mechanism to evaluate the quality of project work, but there is lot of scope for improvement. This paper discusses various aspects of improving assessment methods of project work and demonstrates an outcome based assessment method to evaluate the quality of project work in alignment with the recent guidelines introduced by National Board of Accreditation (NBA) for undergraduate programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科项目的整体评估方法
一般的高等教育,特别是专业教育,毕业生必须获得所需的知识、特定的技能和态度。项目工作是一个主要的组成部分,旨在灌输大多数必要的属性在任何本科课程。实践工程师最重要的活动之一是通过运用其知识并将物理原理转化为有用的设备/解决方案来找到问题的解决方案。这需要创造力、想象力和相当强的分析能力。这些品质可以通过系统的方式培养。认识到这些方面的重要性,项目工作对实现上述目标起着重要作用。项目工作的质量取决于其选择过程,规模和复杂性以及教师导师的支持。一些知名机构,如印度理工学院,采用标准的评估机制来评估项目工作的质量,但仍有很大的改进空间。本文讨论了改进项目工作评估方法的各个方面,并展示了一种基于结果的评估方法,以评估项目工作的质量,与国家认证委员会(NBA)最近为本科课程引入的指导方针保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design Thinking Framework to Enhance Object Oriented Design and Problem Analysis Skill in Java Programming Laboratory: An Experience A Case Study on an Unrealized Truth of an Outcome Based Education and Corrective Strategies Transitional Learning Style Preferences and Its Factors in Newer Generation Engineering Students Efficient Assessment Methods for Improving the Programme Outcomes of Undergraduate - Information Technology Programme in India Effective and Active Learning in Classroom Teaching through Various Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1