Educational Music and Sounds Through the Lens of Theodor Adorno and Immanuel Kant

Erico Jaya Saputra, F. Fransiska, Laura Kristia Dina, Octa Maria Sihombing, Mussion Eric
{"title":"Educational Music and Sounds Through the Lens of Theodor Adorno and Immanuel Kant","authors":"Erico Jaya Saputra, F. Fransiska, Laura Kristia Dina, Octa Maria Sihombing, Mussion Eric","doi":"10.55849/jnhl.v1i2.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background research is based on the assumption that music is likened to mirrors, languages, sound reflections, rhythms, harmonies and melodies. Harmonization was later adopted by education, especially music education worldwide. Music's reflection through education would not be separated from the music education's foundation, which is called philosophy. Thus, researchers subsequently highlighted philosophical foundations of music itself upon encountering education globally. Moreover, research in Indonesia rarely examines philosophical impulses with music (which is connected to sound and voice). Systematically thinking, radical to the roots in search of wisdom on sound (which comes from the vibration of the universe) and sound (which comes from living beings) in music became the aim of this research. Qualitative research method used here is bibliographic research by looking for secondary sources of previous research to establish relationships between Immanuel Kant and Theodor Adorno's ideas. Both philosophers' thoughts on sound and voice are explored through previous research or authors have discussed them in quantitative studies. The authors discuss it through quantitative research. Results show that both sound and voice based on Kant and Adorno both lead to a diversity of expressions without needing a categorical supplement","PeriodicalId":406974,"journal":{"name":"Journal Neosantara Hybrid Learning","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Neosantara Hybrid Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55849/jnhl.v1i2.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background research is based on the assumption that music is likened to mirrors, languages, sound reflections, rhythms, harmonies and melodies. Harmonization was later adopted by education, especially music education worldwide. Music's reflection through education would not be separated from the music education's foundation, which is called philosophy. Thus, researchers subsequently highlighted philosophical foundations of music itself upon encountering education globally. Moreover, research in Indonesia rarely examines philosophical impulses with music (which is connected to sound and voice). Systematically thinking, radical to the roots in search of wisdom on sound (which comes from the vibration of the universe) and sound (which comes from living beings) in music became the aim of this research. Qualitative research method used here is bibliographic research by looking for secondary sources of previous research to establish relationships between Immanuel Kant and Theodor Adorno's ideas. Both philosophers' thoughts on sound and voice are explored through previous research or authors have discussed them in quantitative studies. The authors discuss it through quantitative research. Results show that both sound and voice based on Kant and Adorno both lead to a diversity of expressions without needing a categorical supplement
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从阿多诺和康德的视角看教育音乐和声音
背景研究是基于这样的假设:音乐被比作镜子、语言、声音反射、节奏、和声和旋律。后来,和声被世界各地的教育,尤其是音乐教育所采用。通过教育对音乐的反思离不开音乐教育的基础——哲学。因此,研究人员随后在遇到全球教育时强调了音乐本身的哲学基础。此外,印度尼西亚的研究很少考察音乐(与声音和声音有关)的哲学冲动。系统思考,从根本上寻找音乐中的声音(来自宇宙的振动)和声音(来自生物)的智慧,成为了这次研究的目的。这里使用的定性研究方法是书目研究,通过寻找前人研究的二手资料来建立康德与阿多诺思想之间的关系。哲学家对声音和声音的思考都是通过以往的研究或作者在定量研究中讨论过的。作者通过定量研究对其进行了探讨。结果表明,基于康德和阿多诺的声音和声音都导致了表达的多样性,而不需要一个范畴的补充
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Of E-Learning-Based Learning Media At Graha Nusantara University Android-Based Islamic Religious Education Learning Media Application Design Body Removal Materials For Class Xi High School Students Character Education Strategy In Improving Student Discipline At Islamic State University Higher Education Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar Basic Elements and Characteristics in Building an Expert System The Influence Of Project Based Learning (Pjbl) For Students Creative Thinking Ability Of Twelfth Grade At Yabhinka Welding Techniques Vocational High School In Cilegon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1