Performance Metrics to Compare Various CO2 Reduction Processes

Katherine Lochhead, Guenevere O’ Hara, Dongfang Yang
{"title":"Performance Metrics to Compare Various CO2 Reduction Processes","authors":"Katherine Lochhead, Guenevere O’ Hara, Dongfang Yang","doi":"10.2174/2405463105666220629115030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIn response to the increasing concentration of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere, large research efforts have been placed on the development of a suitable carbon capture and utilization technology. The transformation of CO2 into value-added chemicals is one of the most promising routes for carbon utilization and can be accomplished by thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, electrochemical, and photoelectrochemical methods. The advancement of this technology towards a commercial solution requires a synergistic approach, wherein members of the research community are continuously evaluating the comparative performance of each method and adapting their research directions in response. As a result, the establishment of a universal metric for reporting the performance of thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, electrochemical, and photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction processes is critical. This work summarizes the advantages and disadvantages associated with each CO2 reduction method and identifies their most frequently used performance metrics. Subsequently, a new performance metric, which applies to all CO2 reduction technologies is introduced and defined as the moles formed of the desired product per hour per accessible surface area of catalyst. Although limitations with ease of measurement exist, this work aims to demonstrate how the adoption of a universal performance metric could help to unite the research community towards a common goal and improve its efficiency in finding a solution to the global energy crisis.\n","PeriodicalId":335045,"journal":{"name":"Current Alternative Energy","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alternative Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2405463105666220629115030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the increasing concentration of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere, large research efforts have been placed on the development of a suitable carbon capture and utilization technology. The transformation of CO2 into value-added chemicals is one of the most promising routes for carbon utilization and can be accomplished by thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, electrochemical, and photoelectrochemical methods. The advancement of this technology towards a commercial solution requires a synergistic approach, wherein members of the research community are continuously evaluating the comparative performance of each method and adapting their research directions in response. As a result, the establishment of a universal metric for reporting the performance of thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, electrochemical, and photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction processes is critical. This work summarizes the advantages and disadvantages associated with each CO2 reduction method and identifies their most frequently used performance metrics. Subsequently, a new performance metric, which applies to all CO2 reduction technologies is introduced and defined as the moles formed of the desired product per hour per accessible surface area of catalyst. Although limitations with ease of measurement exist, this work aims to demonstrate how the adoption of a universal performance metric could help to unite the research community towards a common goal and improve its efficiency in finding a solution to the global energy crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较不同二氧化碳减排过程的性能指标
为了应对大气中人为二氧化碳浓度的增加,在开发合适的碳捕获和利用技术方面进行了大量的研究工作。将二氧化碳转化为增值化学品是最有前途的碳利用途径之一,可以通过热催化、光催化、电化学和光电化学等方法来实现。这项技术向商业解决方案的发展需要一种协同的方法,其中研究界的成员不断评估每种方法的比较性能,并相应地调整他们的研究方向。因此,建立一个通用的指标来报告热催化、光催化、电化学和光电化学CO2还原过程的性能是至关重要的。这项工作总结了与每种二氧化碳减排方法相关的优点和缺点,并确定了它们最常用的性能指标。随后,引入了一种适用于所有二氧化碳还原技术的新性能指标,并将其定义为每小时每可触及的催化剂表面积所需产物的摩尔数。尽管存在测量容易的局限性,但这项工作的目的是证明采用通用性能指标如何有助于将研究界团结起来,朝着共同的目标前进,并提高其在寻找全球能源危机解决方案方面的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Small and Rural Local Governments’ Renewable Energy Program Adoption in Cascadia An Alternative Concept in Making Hybrid Flow Batteries into Dendrite-Free Full-Flow Batteries Performance Metrics to Compare Various CO2 Reduction Processes Situational and Trans-Situational Correlates of Public Energy Literacy: A Western U.S. Case Study. Meet the Editorial Board Member
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1